IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] question on draft-ietf-tls-session-hash-03

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Tue, 24 February 2015 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354961A87D0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 07:12:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IACnwNQbGkz8 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 07:12:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com [209.65.160.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB7E31A87CA for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 07:12:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.23] (EHLO alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.4-5) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 1e49ce45.0.4845935.00-2067.13632387.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from <tony@att.com>); Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:12:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 54ec94e15911f791-e97d5c21d19a1e519603d5787b8d22610bbb306a
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1OFCWQT029654 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:12:32 -0500
Received: from alpi132.aldc.att.com (alpi132.aldc.att.com [130.8.217.2]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1OFCRgb029546 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:12:27 -0500
Received: from alpi153.aldc.att.com (alpi153.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by alpi132.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:12:15 GMT
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1OFCFZf018703 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:12:15 -0500
Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1OFC8q6018353 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:12:08 -0500
Received: from tonys-macbook-pro.local (unknown[135.110.241.46](untrusted sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20150224151207gw1000ceeje>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:12:08 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.110.241.46]
Message-ID: <54EC94C7.6010806@att.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:12:07 -0500
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: tls@ietf.org
References: <54EC8900.5000904@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <54EC8900.5000904@att.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010104060109080408010707"
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=V6DKJ5bi c=1 sm=1 a=VXHOiMMwGAwA+y4G3/O+aw==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=mJp9S24oyUUA:10 a=6ASjcdcU7ckA:10 a=BLc]
X-AnalysisOut: [eEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=0HtSIViG9nkA:10 a=oC1tkrrm]
X-AnalysisOut: [O5p1rXNBpm4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=FSZRKXIxUJNAyw2ce74A:9 ]
X-AnalysisOut: [a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10]
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <tony@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.23]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/eGuV54bw_LM6-Pro9b5m5DtYWYo>
Subject: Re: [TLS] question on draft-ietf-tls-session-hash-03
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:12:35 -0000

Thank you for the quick response. In my interpretation, I took things as 
"C really wants to connect to S, but got A instead". I didn't get your 
interpretation when I read it and re-read it. But I can see now how what 
you wrote would also be a valid interpretation.

I guess we'll await a response from the authors.

     Tony Hansen

Benjamin Beurdouche <benjamin.beurdouche at inria.fr 
<mailto:benjamin.beurdouche@DOMAIN.HIDDEN>> wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> To me it seems the sentence is correct as C really wants to connect to 
> A thinking it is an honest server and doesn't know S is involved. Then 
> S doesn't know the involvement of A as A connected unauthentified and 
> forwards info from C.
> But authors should confirm that in case I am mistaken...

v2.15.0 | Report a Bug | By Email