Re: [TLS] Call for acceptance of draft-moeller-tls-downgrade-scsv

Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Thu, 23 January 2014 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <agl@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4087B1A00C2 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:57:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.914
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.914 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ro1SYnndnwYt for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:57:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22b.google.com (mail-oa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D2F1A000C for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:57:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id h16so2530330oag.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:57:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=3NdcVdg80uEWnKSf9D38Glh3s6T731Gy1BEX3I3xEG8=; b=Mk4z58+js64+zIk+rHVEe/brRiBqFmvyuMpCq5XaIAZc8jv4AOHG4jVret1otmNoDD 6sYmwT3k1fhaEgZVgoFL6nv1/EcJTp1z/7Jp5jwd6NPe4XjNKvvevlMLvxx1AedpzRhn kIAsTVEcPXf0r4utp4gXv+ftL0j1okNt2z3gArWy3wlw4u0YcYNalA9uNp6tUU6EoA6I D0848gLA1gmsxrt0H1v3OsRm3XZj5T/3vkPceUetI7PwkQlZ60X1jy7vH7OkSD0Gj2XK HF1fKT83+Cz41V7+Av1Dx4qKjjNmp070f/+2diUSU6EUnUWRQNW1EKgbGlYIBhYhdd5a bOng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=3NdcVdg80uEWnKSf9D38Glh3s6T731Gy1BEX3I3xEG8=; b=LJoU+6DnuNHR10gDbL9n16pNSKCEiWmfnv5BiTTjM/8OB7veC5y9YIKx0f+FZUwHaR hK0fwAlf5S/1sj3TjgixuFH6OHxYu+wUYFKYzv3MpFk1SiG82Ua42v8g4Vw2XzQW4eRp CHwqgblSCc23Sc8HFXerZKss0cg3GRhhRPIMgreMG6cJOxm/nE0Pq9Dao74Ov/fnMhoj Yab0YSgsQ64erjm7cLf9SKKAJkKChgOaSK6DXd9jK9P4PbYtP6MjBItl5UNEznTMyW06 L/9/PPIE18C3XDHwlPz6MoAPf6awl+9oOF7EJ8Lkh+tsXX04DqvmQG7CeqwshH6fymnG pW0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl69ULkzQU4UaJRLLO4n3odSJuYfr4DENYGy5zuAdcTalF9ecHHvY1XS6XlXHftEBhKSSloGEdFhyCo/vsyo3+hbgD6q7/irYN878M0DQ4jr7Kjng94QOZESFaC6wbazxT9GhcSDjl0QP8eZexscYQT6m8qD+OwjNKGm3LFVA4qDUro5ZgbIMWiibgf2pdD51z2TT4h
X-Received: by 10.182.135.165 with SMTP id pt5mr1751526obb.66.1390499867318; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:57:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.79.105 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:57:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBP_-MUonYYsxgz2ZdokiEDVhx4mYq1a4BMayuGbbxb2Gg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBP_-MUonYYsxgz2ZdokiEDVhx4mYq1a4BMayuGbbxb2Gg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:57:27 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL9PXLzPfvqwrVhxBApqCvSh9HCm-0S0orB1hNgWDSN6Vg6Lnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for acceptance of draft-moeller-tls-downgrade-scsv
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:57:53 -0000

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> Please provide any comments on this action by Feb 7. Because
> there has been only modest discussion of this document, the
> chairs ask people who have already spoken in favor or against
> this document to re-register their opinion (feel free to just say
> +1 or -1 and point back to the archives.)

0 currently because I don't know whether it'll work in the real world.
Ask me again in 10 weeks.


Cheers

AGL