[TLS] Issue 588: Code point assignment for ticket_early_data_info
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 30 August 2016 23:50 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B977312D851 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jc7_6-kgGdhH for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22b.google.com (mail-yw0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13E5D12D835 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id r9so21329025ywg.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ipBrIj1hbhGHzzpqWoUvh7kwIMOeYN/QzeOqN0XIVkk=; b=fpu8dgetfWms62Cixi4usy5CNRdGMfjhEYbNU1q4U/aJFGrY8bfTWb3ZScayGC59Hz Pm/Xv5g5XNEVRUB372P5yLI3CVzpfQr5LjkcftbvsFTViDkV6dv8CGs+Z29NPOGyZ9uT mDE1om7L6RQaVc6PROu/ppqWEjsfYZa86yfpFEJ8SkPG01hdwRdb4+HqZRCU3Cxo2uMU EWrRZzUHgp3CxZqyMM5QedK0wscgejROfvZDgG4pXjmrDyGaUVw2TOuzfkXhF9j9O5gS aQJteA0UZBoq1D6sGwh5xccN5PfosBLdcH2qzcp4t1yEOawLRJqh3+6jZSjDsl3fevcW t+pQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ipBrIj1hbhGHzzpqWoUvh7kwIMOeYN/QzeOqN0XIVkk=; b=htFR+3VRUBQtwSF1gx+VQIyOOamkMwY9bJ/xsZ/xBiYrY1JLMi/8YIJLgPdSprhtgU ghpKYzBwwL0egFk+bI9psrg7LhTjS8ZFNUxnNbWs2Y9ui5ZU45YlUdmdGtdQFOktNSr2 B38BheYw46MqAlFje9nAir/6zJ4bVvHMmqlV4NxXpd9FEpJ842vtCsJLvAN0oci+MV+U j/Gg/jlfWfNB7vS59RkDBJkVHcMqCs9wXAmRdjeXTqGjm+DIo2fUF8OwG5XxXQhV+twv ABHgPKjqua7MgaVPa4XALrjmMWA5nFGu9/ihYbYCchwsLEkXsYCD/mBTsACYkhuYEbJe H1aA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwP+O0YbAQ087Rrya7b3AOrILKymbHrMgA4wzocwIDKwXTzhTq8K0HQdxXoEt55orxvzmMavul3jLjTjOQ==
X-Received: by 10.13.244.197 with SMTP id d188mr5868321ywf.276.1472601056092; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.48.193 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:50:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBO2vVAb=0cPm91g5=9=6dp_JfiFNNQGs-RM9O0kZ2Zc5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c086548d8544b053b52a618"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ejqnPuxaxO4EkX9HnXIgOZxhkrQ>
Subject: [TLS] Issue 588: Code point assignment for ticket_early_data_info
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 23:50:59 -0000
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/588 I neglected to assign a code point for this in draft-15. I note, however, that we currently have it occupying a different code point space than hello extensions. I am sort of wondering if it would be more useful for them to be in the same space. Probably not, but I thought I would ask before assigning 1, which is the natural code point otherwise. https://tlswg.github.io/tls13-spec/#rfc.section.4.5.1 -Ekr
- [TLS] Issue 588: Code point assignment for ticket… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Issue 588: Code point assignment for ti… Benjamin Kaduk