Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA7E1A0137
 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id nLFY7nf2eSoX for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com
 [209.85.212.181])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2D4E1A1A39
 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so7055567wic.0
 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=jUTJT7pdeS2jvHdNbxb1zewKx61uncx55ee0BL7LsA8=;
 b=Hj4JSNPM/OOImm+jrHgRN7ip4WU/nuKu02xsehgDgvYtLZKi6MQxwbz5Y42CHFJrNz
 UOCilryHNDed6aPXsa7bpooNxPoSulRAkXTI/P5oQysy3V2LRQvgKlWWJ5TGqnhlK/LS
 HXiQYINwn7WihhB0L6SrzhrOfRZ7gWWRxQf6VHd3mMqIMoqXlvzWvRC9AZ+wlA8bi3Is
 bONLOtnTukmI3TNTSwMyIa22UxO+HDOP/Beqk0aIjY8S4MOuOpsVhri6iH1JgpMyGvDn
 SYoC17YZ9F7u8jT1qz+XUDTBPL1ju4kG2roCsuxsE3brNCLs/PxRnWe0FMryXc2SzP1Z
 SBPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmeDNi+YTKmMJNG3b2lCPFebDwREtTvgL9VLUG7yVUzYalDlrevxXOjqTCoCSE4Uk7euWHe
X-Received: by 10.194.133.129 with SMTP id pc1mr27287957wjb.148.1442451183562; 
 Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.27.79.200 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87h9mt6g42.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
References: <CAOgPGoBT9C=pWebXShqxhbOsnqK+OZe=-n-SvZ_pH-dAtRaWXQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87h9mt6g42.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:52:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNpD2TEEc3Sz=dqF13S9JCJz97d_R5rfsD1_55SxJqO6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01227d94670a1b051fe6d63a
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/eut0WnuFgfTG-EWnJ_jI0uJaL_8>
Cc: IETF TLS Working Group <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous DH
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working
 group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>,
 <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>,
 <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:53:06 -0000

--089e01227d94670a1b051fe6d63a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
wrote:

>         --dkg
>
> [0] I do not think that clients engaged in a DH key exchange should be
>     uniformly required to claim an identity at the TLS layer :)


I agree with this and that's not the intention.

-Ekr


> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

--089e01227d94670a1b051fe6d63a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On W=
ed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a h=
ref=3D"mailto:dkg@fifthhorseman.net" target=3D"_blank">dkg@fifthhorseman.ne=
t</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi=
n:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 --dkg<br>
<br>
[0] I do not think that clients engaged in a DH key exchange should be<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 uniformly required to claim an identity at the TLS layer :)</=
blockquote><div><br></div><div>I agree with this and that&#39;s not the int=
ention.</div><div><br></div><div>-Ekr</div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote cla=
ss=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;pa=
dding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5">
_______________________________________________<br>
TLS mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:TLS@ietf.org">TLS@ietf.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls" rel=3D"noreferrer" ta=
rget=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>

--089e01227d94670a1b051fe6d63a--