Re: [TLS] SNI and Resumption/0-RTT

Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com> Fri, 21 October 2016 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24E312984B for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 07:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.331
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.331 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D_x20ZXbspTJ for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 07:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from welho-filter2.welho.com (welho-filter2.welho.com [83.102.41.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A481294F7 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 07:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by welho-filter2.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0056214147; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:03:19 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pp.htv.fi
Received: from welho-smtp3.welho.com ([IPv6:::ffff:83.102.41.86]) by localhost (welho-filter2.welho.com [::ffff:83.102.41.24]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uVEp5R9sd15k; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:03:18 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from LK-Perkele-V2 (87-100-237-87.bb.dnainternet.fi [87.100.237.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by welho-smtp3.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C71DE2317; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:03:18 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:03:11 +0300
From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20161021140310.GB8197@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
References: <CABcZeBNroww_zA0BRsMrZPMCrF42b2OZPsQNZ9w0bjPoF+fSHw@mail.gmail.com> <20161021085502.GA7878@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi> <CABkgnnVTtDsjJGuv0wG0JQGQcQE-omW=syK=zToKZ-sRumDqEg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVTtDsjJGuv0wG0JQGQcQE-omW=syK=zToKZ-sRumDqEg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: ilariliusvaara@welho.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/fA-ieMMNKTl9vF6NvkM6xR1chj8>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] SNI and Resumption/0-RTT
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:03:25 -0000

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:41:59PM +1100, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 21 October 2016 at 19:55, Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>; wrote:
> > Of course, defining the "same certificate" is
> > way trickier than it initially seems
> 
> Not if you think simplistically: same octets in EE ASN1Cert in both handshakes.

Such behaviour would run into problems with certificate renewal.


-Ilari