[TLS] Missing updates in our RFCS?

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Mon, 30 November 2020 00:51 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4E23A0B58 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:51:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qx2-25aie5gO for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:51:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A98903A097C for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:51:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id d8so17830657lfa.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:51:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cHIV81QqRPnM8mN56AUwhVXig6BqQn5VZjHnFQKETqA=; b=YmOEFBqa1hiA2qZaXGeyGQeUp6gxeU0X3laYphqQcndlukRpRZ5McujxCNy8K2NRO2 CQ+QtUA8FBGwy7LXqU+Pk6eeGXRh0lvb3mS43Cr9iCVsm8tQFK7EQSXExiAzn4e1XgRr ompyk9KcVaLWXVmK5VcMyhzxJomtDQ7Dfyk3GOnkan44RgdI0IhseAegZl/apgt5Mqs0 kaXU5pyG4dYMl8B90PYSq2Z14rA/Fjjv5l2idDHa9umWGL9C6jyO44zMHWv8CaRuh9M/ 0k1R+jDtZYSVtcFPEse4mC0eqWSbepcszYvl491/5oQV8W1hwuLrICcn+qFqKyJaZeyj GhCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cHIV81QqRPnM8mN56AUwhVXig6BqQn5VZjHnFQKETqA=; b=agOYhFMLUTLQrnmB2N1LVvypahEw6+wDAjTws9EQH1X4/fhCwTA8rkgWUJNZbfET42 BM9OkfMdQMhVQjjQohr33Wqd6m3qEwPF9x/7y+XcQ1iYgQK5yT2l2WTgS3EssTEr0qLX ejWs+VtXaFlSdIXmhweT7SLT0BnG4VS6im79eyUsxbMDX/7Drg79c+doq1Htv/510ckp p7uTzSaZFR8LR8Rw4WAwvzWpk/NEns4Iy1z/Or0z2xU2Cgz6T8AAMcYZLOwWzSIv+lTq aq288w8Qh6L+0rldc5rxYyu5q0kqVEFpsjGOMWUCl4lbD55qfXa83WvgccK30Iq2itMb jAlA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533E2v0d5dKDEvdsd6giB28MfHoLWyer++RmjPeehvcoMW+WKf20 gk2xQlHj7Y7nJAljsy6TgBPPSJU4qhxjM+tiN183I/fllZo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJSCwKCgGdtTEGNEfmituQC0bFXbQfexbmZlVBy/XhPVNKmstxjYLtSv+COGUdY9kiPcO/c1xFDiXRJ65dOe8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3e7:: with SMTP id n7mr7747996lfq.585.1606697501150; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:51:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:51:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CACsn0cmzJ_1u5481P4Odr=L6A6mUw5NiB4zR_mwrkdJF1dSZSA@mail.gmail.com>
To: TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/fkKPAXw-KQz33EUchx-EA8-BFzQ>
Subject: [TLS] Missing updates in our RFCS?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 00:51:45 -0000

Dear TLS WG,

I think RFC 7627 should update 5056, 5705, and maybe a few more.

I noticed these omissions when looking at the kitten draft to use TLS
1.3 exporters. Having these updates would hopefully make clear what
uses need to be updated, or at least show where there might be a
problem.

Sincerely,
Watson
--
Astra mortemque praestare gradatim