Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-davidben-tls-batch-signing

[Sean Turner <[e-mail]>]

The adoption call ended on Friday.  There is support for adopting and working on this draft as a WG item. There was one voice of possible dissent, but it appears as if the rationale provided by the authors of this draft swayed them enough to not oppose adoption.

NOTE: Technically, we will formally adopt this draft (i.e., push the buttons in the datatracker) once the WG re-charter process completes successfully.

Thanks,

Chris, Joe, and Sean

> On Nov 21, 2019, at 01:56, Sean Turner <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> At IETF 106 there was support for adoption of "Batch Signing for TLS" [0] as a WG item.  To confirm this on the list: if you believe that the TLS WG should not adopt this as a WG item, then please let the chairs know by posting a message to the TLS list by 2359 UTC 13 December 2019 (and say why).
> 
> NOTE:
> : If the consensus is that this draft should be adopted as a WG item, then this will necessarily result in a WG rechartering discussions.  We would have gotten to this rechartering discussion anyway now that DTLS 1.3 is progressing out of the WG.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris, Joe, and Sean
> 
> [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davidben-tls-batch-signing/