From nobody Sun Mar 28 00:42:36 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876A73A103C for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 00:42:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.096 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=oFI4X7Sy; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=OkyzwAlM Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ewkv5q1CZ6Ub for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 00:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2A8C3A1001 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 00:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6F55C0078 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 03:42:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 28 Mar 2021 03:42:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm2; bh=Cm7exXqPEnKG9jOURJKijcY1aGc6ROQQ12H5HWFWNQc=; b=oFI4X7Sy IARuGS3ifF3xE7KN+ASnIXI6hCatRpQx9sAKa25YwVy+PjkwGD8ccdxrfYR8m4+W LfQXJ4QCSRjxGe0fRHm6uZhIefyx70kFOO76IQZ2IvmCGlLUBt+WGWdfw24aC+Tr xNhC9INzH6QCTEcP1S1mkyAVuk1FunLg+5MZ/m6d6sRBbogt+rIDmLn1sNQ+ayrL UMRwhHJ0PIQbgudoX2Jf17gCHFh+gw5gFDHJ0y5l32DZpnaRjCyOXG+U+mogKVmj NB9iQwQqqtAXzu5zSSC1iUoFKeEFlCaEJR+FDApf8laA1gAqsmxxo/CYKhjz8SBI 8wp9NoiwzaPcgA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Cm7exXqPEnKG9jOURJKijcY1aGc6R OQQ12H5HWFWNQc=; b=OkyzwAlM43MsXL+qVtwrt5MgBiIN6QBcGrUtUn/mJeGSs Wz8SAdt93AqtkqXhF1xlOiV2whsOALFh2KXLnKaoNjuZMV+Ws5LJ7H77TGPiwRLx BshocNlQ5ZoEdG9XZGab1Hj0OO5nf2VeD94HeoNwrDR5SaUf0GlgF1nSJc360QXU i2BXdATcJEQd2vK3q3V8ZTDYF9OgSdxkPQb3WWMGfSUbxSreFRR2e7j3d0tktO9F A2Ao2XXfcanwoRBhRXgQrKN2EEQ/wvudOzygYQtGBGf4PTb7FYTF3WCAncI9OH+l XYUFL+kn+bI25HFCtWJel1HUebGGMwqHF4klIJatw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudehhedguddutdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtje enucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicu uehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudei teenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeehvddrudeijedrudeivd drjeefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepvdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from fv-az186-764.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [52.167.162.73]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4D25924005A for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 03:42:22 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============0703342724051186550==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Repository Activity Summary Bot To: tls@ietf.org Message-Id: <20210328074222.4D25924005A@mailuser.nyi.internal> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 03:42:22 -0400 (EDT) Archived-At: Subject: [TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts) X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 07:42:35 -0000 --===============0703342724051186550== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Issues ------ * tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+3/-2/=F0=9F=92=AC32) 3 issues created: - Server enforcement of ClientHelloInner invariants (by davidben) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/406=20 - public_name edge cases and client checks (by davidben) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/405=20 - [Question] Is there any public-facing setups that currently support ECH= ? (by cujof) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/404=20 10 issues received 32 new comments: - #406 Server enforcement of ClientHelloInner invariants (1 by martinthom= son) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/406=20 - #404 [Question] Is there any public-facing setups that currently suppor= t ECH? (4 by TheDGOfficial, cujof, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/404=20 - #403 public_name and maximum_name_length could be smaller (1 by cjpatto= n) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/403=20 - #402 Not all of CHOuter is authenticated (3 by chris-wood, cjpatton, ma= rtinthomson) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/402=20 - #401 ECH complexity (1 by chris-wood) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/401=20 - #400 Hard to imagine ECH handling in constant time - ponder and documen= t? (6 by chris-wood, cjpatton, davidben, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/400=20 - #398 Is the outer compression really worthwhile? (3 by chris-wood, cjpa= tton) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/398=20 - #397 Including the client's ephemeral public key in the AAD precludes u= se of a single-shot HPKE API (3 by chris-wood, cjpatton, davidben) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/397=20 - #396 A MUST for inclusion of public_name in outer SNI seems wrong (9 by= chris-wood, cjpatton, davidben, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/396=20 - #395 (Editorial) Add some more structure to "Offering ECH" (1 by cjpatt= on) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/395=20 2 issues closed: - Consider a shorter config ID length https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf= -tls-esni/issues/379=20 - [Question] Is there any public-facing setups that currently support ECH= ? https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/404=20 Pull requests ------------- * tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC0) 1 pull requests submitted: - Define HelloRetryRequestInner/Outer messages (by cjpatton) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/407=20 * tlswg/dtls13-spec (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC0) 1 pull requests submitted: - Error -> fatal (by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec/pull/219=20 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-semistatic-dh * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni * https://github.com/tlswg/certificate-compression * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest * https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags * https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec * https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts * https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate * https://github.com/tlswg/sniencryption * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-exported-authenticator * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls * https://github.com/tlswg/external-psk-design-team --===============0703342724051186550== Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)

Sunday March 28, 2021

Issues

tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+3/-2/=F0=9F=92=AC32)

3 issues created:

10 issues received 32 new comments:

2 issues closed:

Pull requests

tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC0)

1 pull requests submitted:

tlswg/dtls13-spec (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC0)

1 pull requests submitted:

Repositories tracked by this digest:

--===============0703342724051186550==--