Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0?

Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com> Wed, 31 August 2016 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A7712D73F for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.785
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.785 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=1.506] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k5bwBT2amB2i for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46C6D12D73E for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [173.75.83.97] (helo=Williams-MacBook-Pro.local) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <frantz@pwpconsult.com>) id 1bfB7e-0002UZ-2T for tls@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:24:30 -0400
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:24:30 -0700
From: Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <3453142.248EJ6K14H@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <r470Ps-10116i-CEC3CA8865CF43238F20CDDF8386D067@Williams-MacBook-Pro.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Mailsmith 2.4 (470)
X-ELNK-Trace: 3a5e54fa03f1b3e21aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7905749c1ff73b7e8b6f162d72570fa0ed350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 173.75.83.97
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/gL3raOcJyGL75uWafEmZzU7P-QA>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 19:24:37 -0000

We could call it TLS 3.4 which would match the internal ID. :-)

BTW, I think using something other than 1.3 is a good idea.

Cheers - Bill

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz        | When it comes to the world     | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506      | around us, is there any choice | 16345 Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com | but to explore? - Lisa Randall | Los Gatos, CA 95032