Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 01 February 2020 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB001120045 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:12:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eT2EE8siyD90 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:12:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd42.google.com (mail-io1-xd42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EB28120024 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:12:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd42.google.com with SMTP id k24so10475420ioc.4 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:12:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tFdYPeyNgxS9LjeQ0K/RjMUW/nevGE+jwBDLdWMkvq4=; b=i5NndRdPC1697M2ywLuNClREJaTqwmQUvoXO1s7x3lti9pjQeAV1h6UrJ3myBWaFTY mkeid17Ps15UbELx5LOMCbdlPA6aYVsdJ7z0EtGqTkRd3RYaE/LPeDPnMUArgHLla0J4 ha8doub2cKogcZJcbVYJmpnjZ889gHzBVdei4Drs65G8wr/fTgPsbNF3U56WWebbr5oK SlknrR5z7k9YA4WqXKOf9KQET7Uq5r+XOLLOycSHWuvSbLkJ9h4rK4d4SwRTTQOHfzgd 38smHvn6nUtKxHtIwcxXazFsDQP1dVdrtfqWFuL/1YDYYHi7AvggRR2J4EQ7tKaLJe8d PFxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tFdYPeyNgxS9LjeQ0K/RjMUW/nevGE+jwBDLdWMkvq4=; b=ZPX/vii9st8Nxktknsioy8oDnPb7FC1bRvWa6FRylnnzJpCJ6EOuO0LlxXU4a5sVhV KmsdczHjITG0P1E4+o3FeRW+WeeQMqk8CSs8auEMoeZBLOwbjySzOCAbBHVf0W/ELftq BdNR68JAKmpJtTyOZ5D3IG5DsF4Ito6y5TVkAeSU0QdUfJwP9DrCDEVYSuMR3zCarYq3 m59lCPmY+3E9eKZJ1TAMz5/WPtVm529oOhYUhgiZNmWAqhmTnO81JifnGyQ79iwKirJk X8LTGoaurCaw+ATbGzv8Yj6mq2kxb0c4y+WO0qn+/hqTPIYYJkzQqEQo7esZUt1c1x1f 5Rsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUoc7sTdwb1UFe+IuHKNvqt2MPGGx2Lji8Lzf4XYdMVHwdWq2Pk Fgt1SCw0eZHC18hBYM/tpRzzlPkRi6Rx2ylua+g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyVMNwCDFLyUGgtLKMwdgYWRNMd7vc4B/YqucIscjXx+ujVZVHAMlzGmoFpjtyxZiyCI1vE5wAioaMg9FD3N0I=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6103:: with SMTP id v3mr11195848iob.49.1580523158508; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:12:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACsn0cngxBQTB+Pfw6t_+qsSFb0Kf8mV1U1J1UTsPJiUk=vg0w@mail.gmail.com> <20200123193250.GD12073@localhost> <20200123210151.GG73491@straasha.imrryr.org> <5F5F670C-A0BD-4F38-BEFF-192C171EDAC1@apple.com> <20200131235533.GA18021@localhost> <CAChr6Sz6PEgQUQg8dB9Ym0z5_iRjmZE5g1hUCCgEOsA-7A=P-w@mail.gmail.com> <20200201011115.GB18021@localhost> <CAChr6SywucrTUsAeN6Aw26ufmhcB8txAmFVNGnUaeR3gG653VQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200201012302.GC18021@localhost> <C68AD2F6-E8AC-4AC1-AD66-6355997D02C7@apple.com> <20200201020725.GF18021@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20200201020725.GF18021@localhost>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:12:26 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6SxnR4Zxhww8+4+AsKJ4NBtsqv_vvHMHi613sZ=4_OXA-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006c18cc059d7a397e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/gTtO0LA6HQdwosIDT8N9iCUVySE>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2020 02:12:41 -0000

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 6:07 PM Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:

>
> A substantive issue was raised.  Until that is disposed of through
> normal consensus-finding mechanisms, there is no consensus for the I-D
> to progress.  That's how the process works.
>

Explain your reasoning.

thanks,
Rob