Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handshake and data messages
Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com> Tue, 14 June 2016 05:23 UTC
Return-Path: <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCC712D0D8 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4_5UKOGcsnlb for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0703.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::703]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15E6112D103 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=QuFROHBL9G4l6thW21Jb8GRxv6H1rGynawIbqMcRz3E=; b=lPyT2vxif4GcbXJHwxNU3N9o3aFvoVj9cXXBKzEa+dl7hoj1kLfsLtUXoOchYYaLGvHWt9xgc5mLuibRo18ZpFeotKTBaGBFg1Pr230rr3spBeyfoK40NpOGagmB9C9ZIKdKiqZkSEuUrnXxENeGqvzVLuujtmP9udr8yZDl6ys=
Received: from BN3PR03MB1445.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.34.28) by BN3PR03MB1447.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.34.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.517.8; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:23:31 +0000
Received: from BN3PR03MB1445.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.34.28]) by BN3PR03MB1445.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.34.28]) with mapi id 15.01.0517.009; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:23:31 +0000
From: Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>
To: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handshake and data messages
Thread-Index: AQHRxaXnd1+1nm92PUe7AUdKIO7TFJ/obc/A
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:23:30 +0000
Message-ID: <BN3PR03MB1445AB4EF24CDBFE2323B2CC8C540@BN3PR03MB1445.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAOgPGoDRZdJN7DY10tDoEEidVkxeKabCcW_U3vQqaaH6x162gw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOgPGoDRZdJN7DY10tDoEEidVkxeKabCcW_U3vQqaaH6x162gw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [50.46.229.189]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bd99316a-1b8c-41e0-aed7-08d394140608
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR03MB1447; 6:RO+ULUAnvfLU87Ge1W/bxN5tTU9FERb9Q8WgAowEPLNgqfoQI+ux+rHbPhNh8XswHax9nnIeEn2r/t1WIL21FUWVCRKZWtP5EsSqQ9iRyjKbV1aGIKZY6lOM2p+cym60uHZEPO57OOzZhsX9Ct1XsxTkEdil/BIdLDv6FkMouq3OubfKyv9wiQxQoW0f3EnbRURjs8Fxy42Tq/t/bUjFXd9tJHOWEuERqZG34MI1UQUbMzQwNffd39AWgn93V/X0N0J7+fhlbHb0p2LAwMRBFmIEDfLxBh5AyCn1+fE6k8sqn30f/6RUoLmbJ1o3yx9O; 5:OtF267bCFHHhPSt2iHXFV9IM9v2+rO0RASSn/Ya6qeNDgRv0gyIhYm7Op8Gt52PNhcafyO341d/s3eR5S/26RdGrwlun0fxxPwRo3gicVUrLzo/XigoI38eGQh8jDHKAS5r6KYZ7pGRp4bzZPEjTOg==; 24:oQdhMZ+qhiATahwL0Fbu7MGkIvVaSKI+UWL94KwB5JRpmze7FuJxuSlpl4KBDgjwC5bGWKV/jMgzji4JflIx+D3fDwXDNZrEx6nSUPUMKZo=; 7:NJlqCYlI641ySZs4gkuQugpm5EJ5JzICC4q8Nu0esi9lQfExKnvsFRLJhpEExNKwtgYghETAZWUzfb+Nr5Qi2GCx9fxdj04n/iiHErmqItWo8i1YtiAyn2yuA/ld2yfUiE/1dz5Cw2AVnDrOVF5BhximAQyLRY89VQZLts+VhH8mqpIVkSQKXHX4RGxmES1ZVdvYCRkcGMDOVkiAqffOgZEuIKrwlALsyIcoTImbEvA=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN3PR03MB1447;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR03MB1447CED328A1D0F08E67338C8C540@BN3PR03MB1447.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(100405760836317)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:BN3PR03MB1447; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR03MB1447;
x-forefront-prvs: 09730BD177
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(7916002)(377454003)(189002)(199003)(5001770100001)(102836003)(6116002)(790700001)(9686002)(7906002)(68736007)(19625215002)(10710500007)(76576001)(86612001)(8676002)(92566002)(122556002)(81156014)(107886002)(189998001)(586003)(81166006)(2906002)(2501003)(3660700001)(2420400007)(5008740100001)(15650500001)(3280700002)(3846002)(7110500001)(8936002)(97736004)(10090500001)(2950100001)(2900100001)(5005710100001)(8990500004)(66066001)(10400500002)(10290500002)(77096005)(19617315012)(19300405004)(15975445007)(5004730100002)(54356999)(76176999)(50986999)(101416001)(5003600100002)(33656002)(74316001)(19609705001)(16236675004)(19580395003)(19580405001)(106116001)(99286002)(106356001)(105586002)(5002640100001)(86362001)(11100500001)(87936001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR03MB1447; H:BN3PR03MB1445.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; CAT:NONE; LANG:en; CAT:NONE;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN3PR03MB1445AB4EF24CDBFE2323B2CC8C540BN3PR03MB1445namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Jun 2016 05:23:30.8899 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR03MB1447
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/gZVNz3YlrkzSv4d3bRMIn5kUpmw>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handshake and data messages
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:23:53 -0000
I prefer option 1. Cheers, Andrei From: TLS [mailto:tls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Salowey Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 12:00 PM To: tls@ietf.org Subject: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handshake and data messages For background please see [1]. Please respond to this message indicating which of the following options you prefer by Monday June, 20, 2016 1. Use the same key for handshake and application traffic (as in the current draft-13) or 2. Restore a public content type and different keys Thanks, J&S [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg20241.html
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Will Serumgard
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Björn Tackmann
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Colm MacCárthaigh
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Hugo Krawczyk
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Nick Sullivan
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Yoav Nir
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Benjamin Dowling
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Felix Günther
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Björn Tackmann
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Yoav Nir
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Henrik Grubbström
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Hannes Mehnert
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Cas Cremers
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Eric Rescorla
- [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handshake a… Joseph Salowey
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Andrei Popov
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call for keys used in handsha… Karthikeyan Bhargavan