IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Status of X.509v3 TLS Feature Extension?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 28 April 2014 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9791A0A22 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YBGSbdnw_TL8 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com [96.6.114.98]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417001A04C5 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4014E1655AA for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:57:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay04.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay04.akamai.com [172.27.8.27]) by prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353391655A5 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:57:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from usma1ex-cashub.kendall.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cashub6.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.27.105.22]) by prod-mail-relay04.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DFE47BD5 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:57:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.107.26]) by USMA1EX-CASHUB6.kendall.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.105.22]) with mapi; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:57:51 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:57:50 -0400
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Status of X.509v3 TLS Feature Extension?
Thread-Index: Ac9i8Y1MzP5I4+G1QfGkQrts08lluQAAI0Uw
Message-ID: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120C61F5D0@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CA+aixj_i8XF2buDNMOp2=_Z0XzT3R4uGfxJtjoGt-_PButSggw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+cU71=FtZfzGktLhLz_j99mQ=LVbd0kzz0ZyGbewQUS0ouEGA@mail.gmail.com> <535E353A.9030008@comodo.com> <20140428142029.GT27883@mournblade.imrryr.org> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120C61F59F@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <20140428145250.GU27883@mournblade.imrryr.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140428145250.GU27883@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/gbdB80XJ-7HGaG1PYWT_rs20v7g
Subject: Re: [TLS] Status of X.509v3 TLS Feature Extension?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:57:54 -0000

Those are all really good questions, but seem to me that they're a matter of local trust policy and not policy that should be nailed down in an RFC.  Do you disagree?

	/r$

--  
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technologies, Cambridge, MA
IM: rsalz@jabber.me; Twitter: RichSalz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email