IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus: TLS1.3->TLS*

Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org> Fri, 02 December 2016 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <azet@azet.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392CC124281 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:58:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=azet.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f3QJ0uXTdgnR for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:58:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wj0-x232.google.com (mail-wj0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c01::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D4ED126BF7 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:58:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wj0-x232.google.com with SMTP id mp19so241471289wjc.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 11:58:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=azet.org; s=gmail; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=kn+BvQTTi53WVEqiIKayHa8zpbBrCasyvocqg1d8Tow=; b=atPVIW0w1p8yAzGPEnfLS8KBKO2hhfUueVfLr9H5UtVT5At16EuI3SOpjUgFfv17bv K7NpHMZ/Y/WRa5mWhnN0d2fdcBeMR+Jp+MsAtZ1PLyBbvhxnKlSbantmtL9CQpHWKUys rUm2RoIBR/9T6ANS4VYAjVIa/jVBXBWpko+Ek=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=kn+BvQTTi53WVEqiIKayHa8zpbBrCasyvocqg1d8Tow=; b=aqPNffZzKDwkdlbfvxpsMOMuo6l68v6MhGmL6zHXUFZScBRtpu1SPqNWTdsvSLutLi SznqKeoXVgKi0397kodoix0fDjcZSVXlzSr3XdtWXGYmWTfAJ0ZbNVgQ4zQ6YhSrRpL3 f+0YQHvrViknqFI9crTzx2/A3c9i/N3vd+ZpZn5S+nWWPtAZfXxTuJx8OgUcZ6Ji4spI 13oWdt6yozOP7nZ9ooQSRkFM5Lzf9PMIchlB9JBqpGMQil3gYRXXG4SlrEJPzAhUEX07 Iw1eA1fMndtBNxPBq6UiCT3U7bZDgcrvUXJQKo0CvfSMJ/SCLJ68a+kVwdgJ90p35yNI PGuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01vHV0cP6zRZ25+C9kNsV8hhGoPrDmIrdMkwXDiZILvN3+41FUDZb8JfSJlrEEZvg==
X-Received: by 10.194.176.10 with SMTP id ce10mr12437790wjc.155.1480708709565; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 11:58:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from typhoon.azet.org (80-108-49-181.cable.dynamic.surfer.at. [80.108.49.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b7sm7134826wjm.39.2016.12.02.11.58.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Dec 2016 11:58:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 20:58:27 +0100
From: Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Message-ID: <20161202205638.67c3882366@4ac7a46126f5bbe>
References: <CF83FAD0-B337-4F9E-A80B-2BAA6826BF41@sn3rd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CF83FAD0-B337-4F9E-A80B-2BAA6826BF41@sn3rd.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/h71NlNk2E3Nz4LfUpsrVjcZNGQg>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus: TLS1.3->TLS*
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 19:58:33 -0000

* Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> [18/11/2016 03:13:23] wrote:
> At IETF 97, the chairs lead a discussion to resolve whether the WG should rebrand TLS1.3 to something else.  Slides can be found @ https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-tls-rebranding-aka-pr612-01.pdf.
> 
> The consensus in the room was to leave it as is, i.e., TLS1.3, and to not rebrand it to TLS 2.0, TLS 2, or TLS 4.  We need to confirm this decision on the list so please let the list know your top choice between:
> 
> - Leave it TLS 1.3

Please let's keep it to TLS 1.3 which we have been talking about for
a couple of years now, no-one expects a protocol from this WG with a
different name (of course I'd opt for SSLv5 just to mess with people).

Aaron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email