[TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 01 November 2020 07:33 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F7E3A0F61 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 00:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=R0xp5eAM; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Im7jUxAl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZAgHx-SDXVYY for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 00:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F4083A0F0B for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 00:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED24B6D8 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 02:32:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 01 Nov 2020 02:32:54 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm1; bh=/L8qhI7xYClYQSURn/BYVJF1AjpkV5Rhg/c+UIA/3T4=; b=R0xp5eAM YZ7X7fcTv3DiZr4Zv/44bIGwLUw262PasGUroDgTHwD0LY+4M1jcwnG8b2FpGNCV ExSU3JLOK7KrnALCD/YXpbTyfaNmWm/SfwdShPBnYiZ91VRDqks7vCeF6GuHFN52 y74KWownf+G9BXiO0C59K9e4Gbu22/zNDxs51OUmY218Pa9sUJ5yCF37sY4T6bez bgvZDoo1kEpSPH035XbFa6MjTcBw0P4P78LjTrwFz3vJXuZS3CAnLgGaN44Jgv1V mEKpEQfAwbqb4ws0iFS9ZEDsNs3m6z6uJ3C/WuL1DNmt9wflNpz7BbmDu4o/3qEq G470Lfh9+hYNRg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=/L8qhI7xYClYQSURn/BYVJF1AjpkV 5Rhg/c+UIA/3T4=; b=Im7jUxAlbCC8ddGM8pUQT4DFPyZgmObrvjHXlMyHsU+XN xn9CA0GAARhpMWQHuAat/ixvG/t9GHnhRg3FpVAKPNfsj/kIQL5TEg26b3o1Oowv ZwkyT9ZTKS+Yk3meOQei5ahBiinoms76igoTmjjuPvQBto/IFi0UToktUXnZD0bq GOFHmh1GaBoy287+GzLywF+LYoPtMDXxBjlj+Y3x3JHJP0pKI7j25H3IbgIwb8HN O1xEytfAT6Gmhj9v35GBn8wjYxIas24V4TIegzHeJKM29W7d4WOMHfH3rlfmnSCN ylJUWQ/qgdjgVYZAhSWyU4GZYWGXia6UE4SUxtRCw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:pWSeX3aZOupJsoFT0E0AF3gUC5mi6tmvtcsF0rwrAaAXsYeugyXC8Q> <xme:pWSeX2Z3kXVQomknDdJhC56ItQRDMW9r22HEqcRhTQ83EXopzc2FB6weYIHwr7niW xqbQOt5cv0aTJhAjA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrleekgddutdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejne cuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicutegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceu ohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefgfefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieet necuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucfkphepuddtgedrvddutddrudehrd egjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:pWSeX5_SnT0wqk66BMiNo6y9It9hCcSwmZ0YhlP8IwGeKYArj5QT_Q> <xmx:pWSeX9rz5FgGrHo0iwz1OamB-LFGP6gncKtaQDf4igfI6JLyK_GhuQ> <xmx:pWSeXyp0zaFwWdQSW6v0QjHZhGnKpkqksy9tz_YvK1G5LudY6eUNYQ> <xmx:pWSeX3Dg0Gjn3hb6oK3hksQ-5qa3ckOCW6CWqz-nbmGVaqc9nkH8dg>
Received: from fv-az60-664.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [104.210.15.47]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 702FD3064680 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 02:32:53 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============7290613395461193978=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20201101073253.702FD3064680@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 02:32:53 -0500 (EST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/h7mOgqMW0Ipa8eFmnVrXJZVdsto>
Subject: [TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 07:33:09 -0000



Issues
------
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+0/-0/💬6)
  2 issues received 6 new comments:
  - #349 Avoid computing a new HPKE contexts on HRR? (1 by davidben)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/349 
  - #348 General server handling of ECH extension is unclear (5 by cjpatton, davidben)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/348 



Pull requests
-------------
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+2/-0/💬1)
  2 pull requests submitted:
  - Use the same HPKE context between the two ClientHellos (by davidben)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/352 
  - Rearrange the server HRR text. (by davidben)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/351 

  1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
  - #350 Clarify client and server roles (1 by chris-wood)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/350 

* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest (+1/-1/💬1)
  1 pull requests submitted:
  - editorial/nit fixes from AD evaluation (by kaduk)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest/pull/21 

  1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
  - #21 editorial/nit fixes from AD evaluation (1 by chris-wood)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest/pull/21 

  1 pull requests merged:
  - editorial/nit fixes from AD evaluation
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest/pull/21 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-semistatic-dh
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni
* https://github.com/tlswg/certificate-compression
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags
* https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec
* https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts
* https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate
* https://github.com/tlswg/sniencryption
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-exported-authenticator
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-grease