[TLS] Call for TLS Server-ID check reviewers
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Sat, 07 August 2010 14:23 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589933A699C for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 07:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.839
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.839 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.137, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8L8IEQGS5Vg for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 07:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764FF3A69E3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 07:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxj4 with SMTP id 4so3727683yxj.31 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 07:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.90.82.4 with SMTP id f4mr9962586agb.128.1281191048168; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 07:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.90.214.10 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 07:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 10:24:08 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTimaZHpxcOHETovB+cjTv0t-3nwODzy2f0wpYH=h@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e68db78850c6c8048d3c894f"
Subject: [TLS] Call for TLS Server-ID check reviewers
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 14:23:40 -0000
Hi folks, As discussed in Maastricht, there is an individual submission, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09 which attempts to create a harmonized set of rules for verifying server certificates out of all the various rules found in TLS-using protocols. Obviously, this is highly relevant to the TLS WG, and in Maastricht we agreed to (1) solicit reviews and (2) do a last call about a week afterwards. I'd like to get at least 2-3 people from the email list who weren't in Maastricht to agree to do reviews. The new draft is out so it's time for this. If you're willing to do this, please contact the chairs. Otherwise, I'll probably solicit some reviewers directly :) Thanks, -Ekr [As WG chair]
- [TLS] Call for TLS Server-ID check reviewers Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Call for TLS Server-ID check reviewers Ben Laurie
- Re: [TLS] Call for TLS Server-ID check reviewers t.petch