Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 11 September 2020 13:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378AC3A0C1F for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vw9f9wnzobHV for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1AAB3A0BFC for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08BCxpft023968; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:03:49 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=aP667oCP/4Z0Eb8tjn75nyisa+JDRuIxVux4o7XjyeY=; b=E6r0m3i6lhLnmwXab1PmWMrF5ZVEvRmk+j8wA8GOy6PRmkhARJlwOalvhx31kDHI1Lhw cio/uBphNmycBgris84xHg656PA7yxkUVgHo5cPg7I9rHXLqQE83ByXGHRyW9NWOuyPe Sg7tNPYTovn9UWb/K4/jkcyCd37F/HJIwa2XGyBADwNf1yN5ykV1UCqI3/akEP3uRL0Y sed6r0Ry317hrx114qTKYX+GTOtPiTZT/Z0cA1ooRYcRf85BssyFfzlIVEAUZFd4iC44 4rC4PrYni/PuwiC3q9Su7uySqAb0i8E8VQQLpgjEFBYW2XTkEY5tY9PFd+pv29zqCfJn LQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint5 (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [184.51.33.60] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 33c5sf1wmv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:03:49 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08BD0qfs007640; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:03:48 -0700
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.53]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com with ESMTP id 33c8n9x7yu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:03:48 -0700
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) by usma1ex-dag3mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:03:47 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:03:47 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:03:47 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, Achim Kraus <achimkraus@gmx.net>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Static DH timing attack
Thread-Index: AQHWhrp+9EGmAKHnM0S2YOV3OYQKzqlhmhsFgACKKwCAAAnAAIAAzLwAgABvwAA=
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:03:46 +0000
Message-ID: <75773EC4-83F5-42E2-926D-568B159B47B7@akamai.com>
References: <5595BB40-3AFD-4327-B7B7-5E63FFC594DD@akamai.com> <1599729784370.87441@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <fff1a66a-0a49-cfbd-461a-c1d0ed3aeaaa@gmx.net> <F5B3E4EB-1342-428B-B28B-CCDB323BAF86@akamai.com> <1599791029197.84073@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
In-Reply-To: <1599791029197.84073@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.40.20081201
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <83CFF61CF2E479478A8A209D0C9DE698@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-11_04:2020-09-10, 2020-09-11 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=962 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009110103
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-11_04:2020-09-10, 2020-09-11 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=914 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009110104
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/hUow7IuKYjhtxssVn1RG2__Sh6k>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:03:57 -0000

>   Which, given that it's such a footgun would IMHO be a good thing, but others
    will probably disagree :-).

Got it, thanks.