Re: [TLS] SNI from CDN to Origin (was I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-08.txt)

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 09 October 2019 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BFB1200B7 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 04:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GbDGrvRKBxJr for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 04:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3F191200A3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 04:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x99Bpj1J011440; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:51:49 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=xp378uG8RaTboc02r8IT/05E8XOQ2AVoYKDZv/h+lhE=; b=pH5zzr1/vWkO1wj1iTjeVkf/RaJWL+rWGebZKuiE7WP3tNLi/QZH7BqFT7l1MFBeu3UF 0KI6fq5a/kAMq0QMiA06hNFAsaM+8FQX5tCjxRQUGeVO7Cec1jlSncpisHH3WXwBQVMn 1Rn49wCYCLf1hjPM2g8m7/SI6/hMGGfNYnReL3+Yj/MeyTMkhVld2hiBil+OlP3H2G6e Pgee4ozAJnr8GR6thrcTp88kpQxxg2gbqNG+wqXU7nXdMbRhQC/04TxE+u6QuIiIfGAT 7X9XogX2xMweoRlfg7V6CntV0q3P//mMsw1RfbR68cnO641/pwv2hZ0eUXdKU8zuYA66 NA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint8 (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [96.6.114.122] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2veg8fc7nj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 12:51:49 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x99Bm2Z3007220; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 07:51:47 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.112]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2vepgxxse7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 07:51:46 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.121) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:51:46 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:51:45 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
CC: "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] SNI from CDN to Origin (was I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-08.txt)
Thread-Index: AQHVfeEan68Gaya+/0+PCTwF7OLHjKdRDe0AgAEeEACAABjcAA==
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:51:44 +0000
Message-ID: <F932C81B-95E9-4044-B975-9AFCD09CF7FA@akamai.com>
References: <157048178892.4743.5417505225884589066@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAChr6Sy9=GbUO19X0vc0Dz7c565iPAj=uWVujLV5P3_QL5_srw@mail.gmail.com> <28C7A74D-5F9D-4E1A-A2D2-155417DA51C0@akamai.com> <CAChr6Szay7j=czCaYhKGp9bHHmZiArU440hSnvNqNaL+hX2wKA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Szay7j=czCaYhKGp9bHHmZiArU440hSnvNqNaL+hX2wKA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1e.0.191003
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.214]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F932C81B95E94044B9759AFCD09CF7FAakamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-10-09_05:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=871 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910090111
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,1.0.8 definitions=2019-10-09_05:2019-10-08,2019-10-09 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=856 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1908290000 definitions=main-1910090112
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/hjNJnz7tBZT8D3FXioJpoczVrwA>
Subject: Re: [TLS] SNI from CDN to Origin (was I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-08.txt)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 11:51:55 -0000

  *   Well, TLS is a transport layer protocol. I think my suggestion might apply to any client that's sending a certificate.

I’m not disagreeing, I’m just explaining why it wasn’t a focus.


  *   A link from CDN to Origin is just a particularly easy-to-deploy use case, since client certificates are already in wide use and IPv6 tends to work flawlessly.

It does?  Gee, cool.