Re: [TLS] TLS chairing changes

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 13 March 2014 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199331A07BB for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C3HIo63rC14a for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B58B1A07A6 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.55] (unknown [118.209.14.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B599509B6; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:32:32 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <532081F3.1080608@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:32:30 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FDFB354C-144C-41AD-A18E-1E31F7A851D1@mnot.net>
References: <531F9443.1000002@cs.tcd.ie> <CAGZ8ZG3bQq77n3OaJeLGgQ__KXLfFUfmYR+egKJY0=rdN1jJhg@mail.gmail.com> <532080AD.6080907@cs.tcd.ie> <532081F3.1080608@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/hkT5X5xYr9siS26OVuiMsZRd39c
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS chairing changes
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:32:48 -0000

On 13 Mar 2014, at 2:49 am, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:

> IMHO, basically starting from RFC 5246 will improve transparency. Speaking of which, let me send the XML-ized version I have to Eric.

I have a markdown-ized version nearing completion; all that needs to be done is converting some of the references and a bit of cleanup.

EKR, should I continue that, or do you want to go XML? If I slap it on github and get help from a few people, it shouldn't take long.

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/