Re: [TLS] advertizing the minimum TLS supported version [was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-downgrade-scsv-03.txt>]

Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com> Thu, 22 January 2015 10:40 UTC

Return-Path: <michael@metaparadigm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DEA1A907F for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 02:40:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.668
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0xgowQBRoPRw for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 02:40:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tlsx.org (tlsx.org [67.207.128.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A56E1A0E10 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 02:40:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from monty.local (unknown.maxonline.com.sg [58.182.168.20] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by tlsx.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id t0MB2JIX012904 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:02:22 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=metaparadigm.com; s=klaatu; t=1421924543; bh=gmf5sOJzTH9InnZ54a57KPvU7qc+ZyDOnodaOFiIq3I=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=P9AwMSMtAWat0NSTMz1yBVItTt1Jv1mBC7IvqSksInzpGjs/2CO0+tP6kphBgfaW9 fpQxpiCpwRO0FYdU9KSW8YOfzHrB6chLL3TzjP/3eG0rVHmtKAE3UYiR5vMxvpmxc5 6n/8BPIrF6qc9RrQ50kScHQloJ+v0+ob1nIQucug=
Message-ID: <54C0D391.5090505@metaparadigm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:40:17 +0800
From: Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com>
Organization: Metaparadigm
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com>
References: <40128f312378442fbd26459bf5d7593b@usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com> <, > <20150119192701.190C71B0FF@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <, > <CAFewVt6LRafnJN_L=xVeiAxNcpSB+8vPYzquPfjXsduudyj+QQ@mail.gmail.com> <BAY180-W688DE2930CB7F231E60989FF480@phx.gbl> <, <04690E05-4905-4941-A60D-7BC5CDC93431@gmail.com> <> > <BAY180-W1849690A1D8C42F1063DDBFF480@phx.gbl> <39B8BC24-D539-456F-970B-B11665B0E892@gmail.com> <54C0B783.2060604@metaparadigm.com> <1421919642.2723.63.camel@redhat.com> <54C0CCE9.40604@metaparadigm.com> <1421922289.2723.67.camel@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1421922289.2723.67.camel@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at klaatu.tlsx.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/i2pieVJVY3YFnXRpFZexead2j3s>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] advertizing the minimum TLS supported version [was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-downgrade-scsv-03.txt>]
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:40:29 -0000

On 22/1/15 6:24 pm, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 18:11 +0800, Michael Clark wrote:
>>> 3. Forbidding SSL 3.0 version from the record layer breaks perfectly
>>> valid clients, which advertise TLS 1.2. These clients can only use a
>>> variant of fallback dance to connect to broken servers which impose
>>> those limits. Please _DON'T CREATE MORE REASONS FOR FALLBACK DANCES_.
>> OK. Then an extension to indicate supported versions would in fact be an
>> improvement as it would be protected by verify_data.
> 
> Some time ago, I had proposed a method for clients to advertise the list
> of protocols they support, for the same reason. To allow the server to
> fallback to their preferred protocol:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mavrogiannopoulos-tls-more-extensions-00#section-4

Good idea. Thanks I understand now. More logical than SCSV to have the
minimum version in the handshake hash.