MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <174351230138.2442419.6534148375330223110@dt-datatracker-5b9b68c5b6-zxk6z>
 <4b0291bf-d2f5-4ac4-9fbe-55ba47875e17@cs.tcd.ie>
 <715b57623392284c16bf07e038e1dcd482cdc306.camel@aisec.fraunhofer.de>
In-Reply-To: 
 <715b57623392284c16bf07e038e1dcd482cdc306.camel@aisec.fraunhofer.de>
From: Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 11:31:55 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAFR824y3o7t7WeJaPiT8_ostcRioF9VvHyVMD1xSj3XV2DK1tA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bellebaum, Thomas" <thomas.bellebaum@aisec.fraunhofer.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cec6b40631b93ecd"
Message-ID-Hash: 3YK6ST3MINWZPSS3PGD5TRSDU4CFQ7EL
CC: "tls-chairs@ietf.org" <tls-chairs@ietf.org>,
 "draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement@ietf.org"
 <draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement@ietf.org>,
 "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>,
 "ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org" <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
Precedence: list
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BTLS=5D_Re=3A_The_TLS_WG_has_placed_draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key?=
 =?utf-8?q?-agreement_in_state_=22Call_For_Adoption_By_WG_Issued=22?=
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/i7OLt0FkBULQy-ghuPaOp_oUuYM>

--000000000000cec6b40631b93ecd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> A question to the authors:
> The draft talks about "users that need to be fully post-quantum".
> Can you please give a specific example of such users and their motivation=
?

A specific example is moving to a compute / dependency base that is
minimalist to only PQ primitives they wish to maintain, such as those that
have long update / deployment cycles, as well as those that want a
minimalist PQ interop target

On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 11:18=E2=80=AFAM Bellebaum, Thomas <
thomas.bellebaum@aisec.fraunhofer.de> wrote:

> I agree with Stephen on this one and would not support adoption of
> non-hybrids.
>
> There is no reason to not work on things like preventing key reuse at the
> ISE.
>
> A question to the authors:
> The draft talks about "users that need to be fully post-quantum".
> Can you please give a specific example of such users and their motivation=
?
>
> -- TBB
>

--000000000000cec6b40631b93ecd
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">&gt; A question to the authors:<br>&gt; The draft talks ab=
out &quot;users that need to be fully post-quantum&quot;.<br>&gt; Can you p=
lease give a specific example of such users and their motivation?<br><br>A =
specific example is moving to a compute / dependency base that is minimalis=
t=C2=A0to only PQ primitives they wish to maintain, such as those that have=
 long update / deployment cycles, as well as those that want a minimalist P=
Q interop target=C2=A0=C2=A0</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote=
_container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 11=
:18=E2=80=AFAM Bellebaum, Thomas &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:thomas.bellebaum@ais=
ec.fraunhofer.de">thomas.bellebaum@aisec.fraunhofer.de</a>&gt; wrote:<br></=
div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;bor=
der-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I agree with Stephen =
on this one and would not support adoption of non-hybrids.<br>
<br>
There is no reason to not work on things like preventing key reuse at the I=
SE.<br>
<br>
A question to the authors:<br>
The draft talks about &quot;users that need to be fully post-quantum&quot;.=
<br>
Can you please give a specific example of such users and their motivation?<=
br>
<br>
-- TBB<br>
</blockquote></div>

--000000000000cec6b40631b93ecd--