Re: [TLS] Premaster/Master convention

[Michael StJohns <[e-mail]>]

On 7/30/2014 9:18 PM, Gero, Charlie wrote:
> Sorry for the second late response.  Hectic day.  Here's a follow up 
> from the previous.
>
No probs
>
> In addition, as long as TLS 1.3 keeps static RSA key exchange and 
> renegotiation out as well as only removing PMS to MS in 1.3 and later, 
> we should be ok.  As someone adeptly inferred earlier, this is where 
> things would get hairy for us if any of these constraints are violated.
>
>

I couldn't parse this very well - too many missing commas.  Did you mean?:

"In addition, as long as TLS1.3 only removes static RSA key exchange and 
renegotiation we should be ok"

- and -

"If removing the pre-master secret only applies to TLS1.3 and later we 
should be ok"

I thought removing the pre-master regardless of rev was the issue?

Mike