Re: [TLS] Bikeshedding ECHO

Gary Gapinski <ietf@garygapinski.com> Thu, 21 May 2020 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@garygapinski.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A503A065A for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 11:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wkPqYYHGPE9j for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 11:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server276.com (ns2.server276.com [192.252.145.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B629E3A05A4 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 11:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 19136 invoked by uid 503); 21 May 2020 18:48:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.148?) (gary@garygapinski.com@204.209.68.3) by server276.com with ESMTPA; 21 May 2020 18:48:45 -0000
To: Erik Nygren <erik+ietf@nygren.org>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Cc: tls@ietf.org
References: <CAKC-DJi2qVfuOJ-qUOEaVwmuZJ2dA5qvLmH_5UV3z_9dQ9N3pw@mail.gmail.com> <2C71E03E-CBE6-411C-84EA-3591E7B62B98@apple.com> <CAKC-DJj2vBTDvL2f_5Z1OLPAe9fGKqDBh-tmGpDqgwo52XzGHw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gary Gapinski <ietf@garygapinski.com>
Message-ID: <77a10095-2f3c-57fe-bedd-cff69de389cd@garygapinski.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 14:48:25 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKC-DJj2vBTDvL2f_5Z1OLPAe9fGKqDBh-tmGpDqgwo52XzGHw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ia6OKSlcMzE81hTWsEx9fZkkVmY>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Bikeshedding ECHO
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 18:48:49 -0000

On 5/21/20 11:52 AM, Erik Nygren wrote:
> Are there any objections to "ECH" or should we just go with that?

I have no objection, but would benefit from consensus on whether it 
(ECH) is an initialism or acronym. My opinion is that it is best as an 
initialism (as is, e.g., TLS).