Re: [TLS] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-01

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 20 August 2013 00:13 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4DBC11E81CF for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.009, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yLwNdZ+hgB+e for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com (mail-we0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E49D11E81A6 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id p61so4488441wes.11 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AED2DNeQ4X5KGkJtEAvxaQIQWnReW8N7Q+zr63CTCwU=; b=IoCZSxLEgFIYc4wKG8rp7B8jFI40TlUgt65KPpLZCXZOH7e1PFmHki3tbZTZu+p1K4 Xp+wysq1xo8ej5iLH1d1ii1A8P9fjaW6VmfPLp9o2OwzUHwQaNYefSXgIcBsVkg7uFVp hea5Z/GMU/0UmxjZjs3o1qc6FuO31KQE97AFpMkTiE7N1VYVHO4pRTWvpc0goeknsXJD iBOJeCaQ6vnpHk9Y2FHOqK5KrDhs13k0hsr+/XJiSLTgyhb/SNXEl4Z6+un//ShE+nUw Z2yh4Ta5A0Dtaq90blxDZCVBIsY6zlL/Nxnil0eUpGHy/PXS0vkL1yf2RLdX3D5989iH yTGw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.126.97 with SMTP id mx1mr10289245wib.10.1376957626298; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.28.39 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3651ef9088a147dd8e8d887f769a9538@BL2PR03MB194.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABkgnnXUwLQnVNt19Advb3s7ZGoc_Mrmr7AodigxZKyEZmPYwg@mail.gmail.com> <3651ef9088a147dd8e8d887f769a9538@BL2PR03MB194.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:13:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVGPjw9LV+SK8ow4PJXwVPCkenoVnTgTKqcnP+M5ToGuw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-01
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:13:48 -0000

On 19 August 2013 16:18, Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com> wrote:
> I would prefer to keep the HTTP/1.1 protocol ID registration in the draft because it makes ALPN immediately useable for negotiating HTTP and SPDY connections.

I have no problem with that.  I do worry about the fact that this is
lowercase.  HTTP/1.1 self identifies as "HTTP/1.1" (i.e., uppercase),
whereas ALPN uses "http/1.1", which will cause issues (I can say
"will" rather than "might" because that was an issue we had with the
HTTP/2.0 identification string).  Is there any reason that this is not
the same string that HTTP/1.1 uses?