Re: [TLS] COSIC's look on TLS 1.3

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 08 November 2016 22:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF771294CD for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:43:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BjjW-yXTq9Vw for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:43:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22f.google.com (mail-yw0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 373311295E3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:43:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id i145so101227392ywg.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 14:43:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8KXXvc3TWhIKmj6tohLCV8ASJOjyM71Y6Ev0tNCN8II=; b=NsIipIaK7NqIA0zOWA5qVwOWm0RmXYgMOyjqa/qNo7vxJAPL7aoxkOdE44bhl/0Em0 8JVTzUrVHY6smg8+cFwEnxhL8Fg1f8oDU51s5Gid17QcSbR6rQ+MqOlBsE7WnEw6FTmG R5xvRDRC8zr+QNt1CrYKgcn9KjnjKVmTseCCZoAflTc2txs3ZFJ3WWDMI9EeOkOTCtln cFCoD6yoEClBHQGpc5UrciM2h05XePACh9HsVhrh8MJjra1I22VgZYKlkhGbPh30lCii qneuSjMqemEkzAnyOvO2AknMVNQYcIfsSYwh71feRf/uKTE0abfNYV35CwoCWEQ41rak bH9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8KXXvc3TWhIKmj6tohLCV8ASJOjyM71Y6Ev0tNCN8II=; b=Fwpoy6plrqpYVKwRTn0zw9UEEjZqMEEi1uc170rROtqsvfWztJTIwdAF1nSECJMZfu h9Sm/j2QwzJB6csU5uoJgJAWLH9OfXbwyhWbQY+QjwYUH3xxGfg77/ezIxOR60Z9IGJ/ uyxSe1rL2m+rscIC6mXsxhymjS4515hiOkl/rFUfSmdhX0fIK+yqtCWK0ibhbjVPB56i wHm/yZeWmXl7EtRe5C4YfN0cNHvd6f/B7MJ/vd1/POiDHVsRuemHDm1r7FHdprmkQ4gi eRkAaLdd0OLysbI1oPzsMYkF26FTWrjkr6eURmsxkUgfF70sWfB0TIgbjELb9dRfzsHo fXlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveD/Oaxev2RKmD4x4/tzgJGQ8KeNYcyjt//ANE1u4XJ6dshfB7qziovZlW7wZJL8w8JhyNo7AMRZgnorQ==
X-Received: by 10.129.108.216 with SMTP id h207mr14086214ywc.52.1478645033540; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 14:43:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.159.141 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:43:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20161108223352.GA9878@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
References: <2d2ba626-0b5d-590f-efb7-e4ad30b5608b@esat.kuleuven.be> <20161108223352.GA9878@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:43:13 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMKGygu1+aCGtELRJG49tHX2Mv_1fih9Z-BTVqVSyk=yQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114dd36ef957520540d1df2e
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/j6apDyByqt8f18BOBQGyZZ9BEoQ>
Cc: Jens Hermans <Jens.Hermans@esat.kuleuven.be>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] COSIC's look on TLS 1.3
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 22:43:56 -0000

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
wrote:

> - Yeah, there have been complaints about lack of state diagram, stating
>   that the present ladder diagram is not sufficient.
>

Yeah, I'm taking this point to heart. I've been a bit swamped with
implementation
matters, but I'll get working on a state machine diagram.

-Ekr


>
>
> -Ilari
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>