Re: [TLS] TLS1.3 status/expectations

Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com> Mon, 29 February 2016 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135F71B37F5 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:17:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FXDIOyhOFrDw for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:16:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB8E1B37F3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:16:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [173.75.83.248] (helo=Williams-MacBook-Pro.local) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <frantz@pwpconsult.com>) id 1aaRRA-0007Mq-Pu for tls@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:16:49 -0500
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:16:50 -0800
From: Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <84AEB140-D703-4AC0-91D7-02A01FD71A5A@sn3rd.com>
Message-ID: <r470Ps-10113i-3BFE24193D024971910678C569E9672C@Williams-MacBook-Pro.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Mailsmith 2.4 (470)
X-ELNK-Trace: 3a5e54fa03f1b3e21aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7996ac989a610eaa31f3d1d7395520bb09350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 173.75.83.248
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/jCOgwKQ2zGtbML1X6R7q02IiCFY>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS1.3 status/expectations
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:17:01 -0000

On 2/29/16 at 6:45 AM, sean@sn3rd.com (Sean Turner) wrote:

>One thing that was reinforced at TRON and we think the TLS WG 
>should be aware of is that the research community needs time to 
>do their analysis.  With that in mind, the chairs are very 
>strongly leaning towards an extended WGLC of 6 weeks.

I strongly support giving the research community enough time to 
analyze the protocol. Their methodology offers a different way 
of looking at security issues, and has already demonstrated its 
effectiveness at discovering protocol bugs.

Cheers - Bill

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz        | Concurrency is hard. 12 out  | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506      | 10 programmers get it wrong. | 16345 
Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com |                - Jeff Frantz | Los Gatos, 
CA 95032