Return-Path: X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C46F129B41; Wed, 24 May 2017 15:29:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vXcJOyd3tdjf; Wed, 24 May 2017 15:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-x22f.google.com (mail-lf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C165D129C00; Wed, 24 May 2017 15:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id h4so75077837lfj.3; Wed, 24 May 2017 15:29:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FOdG42rChCzBH0jcHYrlbb88YkgZEs7aF4JexBxxcEo=; b=DT4kFjQ0+Aj5PDK18QdzN1bstfRcSsbVAz3jjTA9ZoIfJWw14wyDXslPvCxVuCiO79 tBNz9ZJwGjJtbSAo7KIGMKg2su9H1KsAp9up1NzifDu21Nzne29A8OMV7DETC79lFDO1 idx68YepWaIzSAQDjPcwPHLlejNiBZEmm6UyLs4DvmEUO/HhT5YYpd004m/NPKUaDSN7 g0tHkYA4rI8ZX0waxjKNPFwnGRElw+zplFsVZ4b1HhYSZq94xAO3n/3c2r9abzGQ3egs EzsGf/UoRIY7YIyOIHzntQHSgpBBoKsIMxx0gOre5LwSHYwjh8XclmYjeUMxhDD5Mzcc h18w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FOdG42rChCzBH0jcHYrlbb88YkgZEs7aF4JexBxxcEo=; b=beXlZEhfpsKED/bM5c8ZvnMKmBaKczWPxEE/0XshN/T5y4ep9GLZ9pfv+Msr/uBNJ4 bzADZWtE6k3ylNbQDWhFgSqWEFzu3LGt5EbdgHmKIpexLqLT/AjTJ4RkLrhUj+Ag7oPl qDQ/r0mQJ4yQ4kLMe0XCMseUDCvsG2wcA45zGQK00COgZkfLFTEZA+8X1Xf0Ibed5NDl cJs76ZTwsUoHDCdSybRNjYPvRtXLSu+GVXJwNkczhjRbNrlcmQeNx0uCRmbUxDRaXqrz IEn8lPMsSRPNVjruu06S7zbkg7UkusoL265e/2lZ/v1OVqMSVLs8y0Do1jMnRT7LeMhI ApSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcB0laeYIq0cpSWyIYw0ehSvHULYw5H3h4Qy0NBLOVia/wUOEr2W BZkAUz+HZDRjsEzupbIFioURMFnu0A== X-Received: by 10.46.7.10 with SMTP id 10mr10716113ljh.113.1495664965930; Wed, 24 May 2017 15:29:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.46.22.73 with HTTP; Wed, 24 May 2017 15:29:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <149550551972.4974.3201248950751611020.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> From: Martin Thomson Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 08:29:25 +1000 Message-ID: To: Daniel Migault Cc: Joseph Salowey , Eric Rescorla , tls-chairs , The IESG , tls , draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [TLS] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 22:29:29 -0000 On 25 May 2017 at 07:43, Daniel Migault wrote: > From your response I understand you do not request changes. I am requesting changes. Just say that TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 uses AEAD_AES_128_GCM, and so forth. It's not hard to be explicit.