[TLS] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-11: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 12 January 2021 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751DA3A0E93; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:14:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate@ietf.org, tls-chairs@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, sean@sn3rd.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.24.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <161047526945.13931.15375970322889859402@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:14:29 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/jhmNM260XjWfvdf3GphbiY2cZVk>
Subject: [TLS] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:14:30 -0000

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Thank you for purging the old versions of TLS.

There is one sentence in the abstract that I found surprising (if it is right).

The abstract states: "TLSv1.2 has been the
   recommended version for IETF protocols since 2008, providing
   sufficient time to transition away from older versions."

Should this be "minimum recommended version"?  Otherwise, I don't understand
why the recommended version of TLS is 1.2 rather than 1.3 (given that the TLS
1.2 RFC is marked as obsolete).