[TLS] Request for Review: Default Port for IRC via TLS/SSL

Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> Tue, 28 September 2010 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3D73A6AF6 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.351
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.351 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.248, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CKCwZgUF3qsu for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E993A6A9A for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so6999799iwn.31 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=/GDeSvA93DVQYzhnZNzO145ZP+1Y4oOBSlp1FO1Ihzk=; b=WI4w5B2dCtkYDOumk7lymM4iP9JB6A4LlN0hed+wVeWG+bYnTLtgaNQWlMFKjxpG9Y 5ArYqnmQTVtFDmc6RcGC0DjaawQgA74VM732H+V0/nSB+PACV9MxvVWyqjVsz3ypzdLk KQqwF+800cV7SIBAoLnqK/xaRMTMibbJDdNr4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=FEqY0xVX20Bcw30vlQEPs4uTN2mMhYnIeJPo/KP7JvN5lAKaS7UhR9UiWgBK0urzCN re+U9A+HxtBrYki/RDzUErX6xU5Ijf2DRhUnKYQDSv2HFLuE6G+26l3CzZHb8pah6Z2C oC7xSUOUr7XLJUhAXWIpGYama7vAZDv7R1SPc=
Received: by with SMTP id i9mr10859066ibh.98.1285681670603; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:47:29 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTik0hgkwm7RRt46Q9GudvzLhd1J8CZee=N3CSJK3@mail.gmail.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: [TLS] Request for Review: Default Port for IRC via TLS/SSL
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:47:10 -0000

Hi all,

I am not 100% sure if this is the correct WG to submit to, if not
please excuse me. Yet, the TLS WG seemed to fit best.

I would like to ask all of you to review my I-D [1]. It is pretty minimal
and should not cause many disagreements, especially since it's
Individual, Informational and merely documents established practice.

Thanks a lot for your time should you choose to invest it,
Richard Hartmann

[1] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hartmann-default-port-for-irc-via-tls-ssl/