Re: [TLS] lasgt call comments (st Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard)

Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> Wed, 04 November 2009 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <simon@josefsson.org>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5E73A6890; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:18:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.148, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GHzR2TYlMRXQ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:18:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from yxa-v.extundo.com (yxa-v.extundo.com [83.241.177.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F7E3A67FD; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:18:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mocca.josefsson.org (c80-216-24-211.bredband.comhem.se [80.216.24.211]) (authenticated bits=0) by yxa-v.extundo.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nA4FIiuU017073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:18:47 +0100
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
To: <Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com>
References: <20091005162704.8C1B43A6873@core3.amsl.com> <D3DC9D45B39CFC4CB312B2DD279B354C29BAE0E5@TK5EX14MBXW653.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <87ocnrpq0f.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <87hbtjppfa.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <808FD6E27AD4884E94820BC333B2DB774E7F7C5641@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com>
OpenPGP: id=B565716F; url=http://josefsson.org/key.txt
X-Hashcash: 1:22:091104:sasl@ietf.org::ftW2jU1+B6N6F/C6:1fK+
X-Hashcash: 1:22:091104:larry.zhu@microsoft.com::F7MW4Uwq1Kik7mX5:5qwM
X-Hashcash: 1:22:091104:tls@ietf.org::t2M4k3UAgVXRhgn0:Le3I
X-Hashcash: 1:22:091104:pasi.eronen@nokia.com::v5vtcQ3FOwHOIInM:B9Go
X-Hashcash: 1:22:091104:channel-binding@ietf.org::/2CohyCJGw2UXiv0:ccXw
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:18:44 +0100
In-Reply-To: <808FD6E27AD4884E94820BC333B2DB774E7F7C5641@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com> (Pasi Eronen's message of "Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:34:38 +0100")
Message-ID: <87bpjico8b.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at yxa-v
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: channel-binding@ietf.org, sasl@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] lasgt call comments (st Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:18:29 -0000

<Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com>; writes:

> Can you check if the latest text proposals (Nico's email on 
> October 30th, starting "I spoke at length with Larry", and 
> my email earlier today) make the situation clearer?

I have the same question as Martin Rex: what is the actual semantic that
is wanted?  I thought I understood what was intended, but given this
discussion my understanding of what was intended may have been wrong.

/Simon