Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-esni feedback

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Mon, 21 October 2019 20:07 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9401120976 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SGk55lt9HjRI for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4632D120971 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id z19so17575687ior.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Qkc73E9VBzesk2i9RNKV6tywLzbZIKWQ5jivt13fclk=; b=TDocGASqqi2cCkqOTWkRzyzTu8Q6NE9q9gohN698sWMpOYNVbAEIjr9TZQ+uDUaVx9 kcVyf0XwIQaO3KUI1VZ0E4+wP6JcjdFp0f5OYWpbTe/6Zy/560A7+alLMtr4wuPSpLOS P65Z8pSm6wFIzu25ZvbR+dGmk487fvF6PN4W3/V3T8M4PYf7a1tR/blQotbebW+59Lhi eXyYN8NFPharY4Cz8ctKMrQpuLQ5w1AdWkXvQNPni4urmF8xqsbP0yNMoCT0ectRy9Ml xliUGOFKg/+Cpm+igG57MQEA5Ybu7G8XWgbiXEN4LVzSGKbPJiLsacmUvLASMCn25mXQ PLkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Qkc73E9VBzesk2i9RNKV6tywLzbZIKWQ5jivt13fclk=; b=ciPoekwjsTK0cNYA/h5lpujluyGx5qOW3Vb+j/I17G+EAiDS3hXYfusXItCDaCNIP6 9uBj0i4FQPdliwd3Xem/1Kej74HeVLEknBNFRm1orkXE+A0JcXodo25vSJU8m67XFM9j U51Ip4zJvD7ylj/TXy8nBVnaKn69NT6ICFa3TjgXvB+aV1IuzwSIWiP1NUzB9V1Se96u H1Cl1vZGVH9VNX7Q4RCYDlzVG6PikUOF3NDdpz7xd4vrjoffsPvmbyxJX7wmSQ3/+gcK hLQZ45NbSehG9NYSwHOMHwADGc5Y7v7w/QW6sWrVhrawwCnq13LK96dJvBOjuxUydLQq tQ2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWeYyFdPhHyHNC0aS/pig8shhz43fCjNI8IRkXhu45567tSY8zH brlwvvwW+CRULOD//O7bmv2yNDDRQI0dalZxro94Dh+PWlo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxYQ1/pOiDIg4A6jeNnSqVlC3BkgoLOSTcEGxIQeKyealWLXWMWE26PJtmfsNcQtFtahmXLJZNC1vnA1wUuu6I=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:9a15:: with SMTP id b21mr51403jal.103.1571688449293; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6Sw3f7du3JYxfcWSZje1zjDzsRBQyDjob-AvzjWeZzKW7g@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPbw_KOo_ieSqkksYPeLtb9DufBz628oFPYc_Ue4S9iww@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SwB+7Jt2TLJSQh3q=Roizdt2=9jCBa9nq8KRxRo=86uZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNBtDK7q175tseEUiCVds=khj4xXYJZRf7GU9VGNDJ_Tg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sz6xHtFWjOKrLp3sp9MpC-SoU9Sx=vk22ditjShA7B=Kg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOnE+gyNu7GarAfO0bptoPfzQQ=VKeWLdpJBDM=E4yhzg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SxWE66jPRbnBRtwNSn3L+uNFkoFBbYNOBAkKDN05qotoA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOy8ogJrmFajxX1pqjqgnE61gE=c3CWz+pp34NWHmGKbw@mail.gmail.com> <03e15760-dfce-cd7b-baea-56ac70d92192@cs.tcd.ie> <CABcZeBMquubsGvt8UssiyFU_ZuQK67rHN_KBXY+iKSNayJFZew@mail.gmail.com> <d9402fe2-2ab3-f60f-c478-dc1df5bd4402@cs.tcd.ie> <CABcZeBNC9YBGMs0b84DFDB-FU7fKXpzX+HP1H5KRcjYJ7kXr3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNC9YBGMs0b84DFDB-FU7fKXpzX+HP1H5KRcjYJ7kXr3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:07:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Szd0dAh-h_oGzD9-fvfm3bYZbFnFrfmEmnbtz6OcmH=UQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b7c3da0595713b27"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/kWP4H6Z2OEQfIV7e148qzL2-zXk>
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-esni feedback
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:07:32 -0000

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:03 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>; wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:48 PM Stephen Farrell <
> stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>; wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Not yet, that's true. OTOH, the 260 value wasn't decided on
>> the list either that I recall.
>
>
> IIRC it was there at the time of adoption.
>

Yes, it's there in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rescorla-tls-esni-00.

I think we should do better than "pretty sure it's right", though.

thanks,
Rob