[TLS] Additional changes for draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Fri, 16 March 2018 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EC71242EA for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 07:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g2F0h_zVTGTc for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 07:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x230.google.com (mail-pf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01AFD126B6E for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 07:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id j20so4188527pfi.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 07:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=tySuYHaINm+d0Sp3/kZ4BprwdYvLEQSNnLfHb7nM2hU=; b=VfRZPMsxV2C9m+ZU7pTKtn0Oi4/rkgCREuJGHvUnoSxxfI9R1t7fdgOOCBBwxs8tAx VJrSDLga0oJ76RWWhpeM5y+JorvBye7ybrQ+v9bQWtBCbYrv7wlYHdQDFIPM0dkeWING XYgFmLlVrWp3+8zNto2T9z4NLwnIh4BsXGerU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=tySuYHaINm+d0Sp3/kZ4BprwdYvLEQSNnLfHb7nM2hU=; b=W76GHp1QUQ2qYXsyUyBijPmCx6BoZqldqRtetIqwVicXKAf61mTdI06P21rnbeAhyR PXegBWplzYdwE403sGdzo73snk/tJyHTHNtImxdwTVnUEJKsH+RBitLjrq3hY1vndU9g ZZeybXYFwKyOJ37rahRE5x1YtW/ewtZDHkE9cR/VqwAOEztig6hDf95If6edw8As7qnM 5y+atdNQEUzaezQOG3sigeCWFutfgzoyj50H0HUbAqkMmYemLWjK9ocIOt7gMVKU7b0C 8m3CkJ/Y/hT3CKcLVZ+XDJTPLSz0BfcsF8u1Uol5rLL4VJlW2LH4ka1HeycF36XPalC/ 4P1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7HotojHyDVzJNJ933sCnnzCzn/bq7i6mGnD2DNnbFaPrncEL6Ma 0MZGUKrSG5kvI+QJfEazRdQkYMpBfCQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELterDfrPHD8Lor1Gs2Z6ytmRLkhcz2kZVXkgKV+Tt80c2WLqzuSBv/5COmsJzreH3gDIq6shg==
X-Received: by 10.101.72.69 with SMTP id i5mr1543756pgs.78.1521208915414; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 07:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [5.5.33.98] (vpn.snozzages.com. [204.42.252.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b68sm15093608pfg.59.2018.03.16.07.01.53 for <tls@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 07:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Message-Id: <505FCF83-C92E-4A90-83BF-4B2C4796EBE6@sn3rd.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:01:48 +0000
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/kc4UhXy_XBvnSL7XyM908fQKO9w>
Subject: [TLS] Additional changes for draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:01:59 -0000

During Adam Roach’s AD review of draft-ietf-tls-tls13, he noted something about the HashAlgorithm and that made me go look at what was said in draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates.  Turns out that 4492bis assigned some values draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates was marking as reserved.  I have fixed that up in:
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates/pull/65

One further point brought out in discussions with Adam was that if we’re really closing the HashAlgorithm and SignatureAlgorithms registry we need to also mark 224-255 as deprecated.  Currently these are marked as Reserved for Private Use.  So the question is should we mark 224-255 as deprecated in these two registries?

spt