Return-Path: X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC0012D7C2 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 20:42:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0_nBiY0pAkvq for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 20:42:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qt0-x230.google.com (mail-qt0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F06DA12D7B6 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 20:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt0-x230.google.com with SMTP id w38so15368601qtb.0 for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 20:42:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0TP0H3dOFjiIzhN6IGPNtemMEsnZiyTJIuhquYAlHy8=; b=OmzgYQRXbLtF1UQVBQoztV8fDrnQa+z83bY191S8BgOvjTdWHevBmGTcdLWeLryIOe QTO/DcnaKzNOLu2VE/PqaOx3PV/tJVVV963NGjQ9USe4l3SLM8/NJ0Jp34nQLP1STAlm 1hYfSflvL0bUgUk6k7n/VQ5BX+vzqeTZOqbF475R/0HlKz/q5Wwqx1IzKHAynIj+iPUr W9Jv919AoUgvg0wjGbILRIzJhVaVSpeNzglcnolky8AI/D4AGpoCePCJoAmyt+DFHLLR WIJHpAbBFNV8CHsXXx6mxL3ynnEg9L0JR6lkSq5yK1p8u6p+AbckOFw4Zb122kV0X1l/ J3Ew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0TP0H3dOFjiIzhN6IGPNtemMEsnZiyTJIuhquYAlHy8=; b=VM9AfsqysWhSuenfL6SdE5CN0gHV28xTIu1kbPaao/Zv0awYMfD43/NhMuDbgCGo+t FcliTSQkfsVTJX37naL3c88fi61pDzk/zXv0penI71lqDm65i/xgeay8LmRGTVsyimcV SJxUAeZkLLsd0shezNx+fI4ioaBmIaM1AcXSzFsXRnXZ0paHsjevL1tIdvTtbsO2sIXt 9029OEdJjoYSI7/Ouoxu+8E59XhjpHUP7Z80Ynr5/7d0975wIQ4YD8ZqlBd3cxjReklc GxePLrRYxQ6Ic6D2lvVXfBhCUuGt6pLf5fDnPX4dqtuciz1Ch7vCZeQcZC7ZCluLKBCY 7cYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouu+9zRkcGZl2SgWBaUlhDS7flfqEXwrANtDhzPh9IpcDnJBekdrRvNFmTHOCzIzu2oRqVhjFbNP8JfDew== X-Received: by 10.200.50.199 with SMTP id a7mr1934235qtb.43.1470800551069; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 20:42:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.22.146 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 20:42:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7D3571C9-9873-4D88-9666-A47D0CD77671@sn3rd.com> References: <7D3571C9-9873-4D88-9666-A47D0CD77671@sn3rd.com> From: Martin Thomson Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 13:42:30 +1000 Message-ID: To: Sean Turner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Cc: "" Subject: Re: [TLS] early IANA code point assignment request for draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 03:42:38 -0000 On 10 August 2016 at 04:45, Sean Turner wrote: > We've received a request for early IANA assignments for the 6 cipher suit= es listed in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead= /. Please respond before August 23rd if you have concerns about early code= point assignment for these cipher suites. Did that request provide justification? I know that we've done this a fair bit recently, but is there a reason why these can't wait for the docs to at least pass WGLC?