IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] padding bug

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Mon, 09 September 2013 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C2311E8214 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 07:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w91GbkoEUoG1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 07:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6227E21E81E4 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 07:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id s9so13235551iec.35 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 07:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8B7Fq68wnL+yQIUQsG8r5BGlFegsTP6A5otg8Rqj0+c=; b=HKnyp8UGwgAe+H/tpKp6v/dfKSoN+z+mtB0iZCzZ6SadAXNvlcH5wsj3lHBfTdCR0D uJQ7G6A6cZWtfH7jpZ1UlXmkIYqpjy91Q6Z0fD8OyaahXH1FBPdsuj0tUP8ZlnvdCWrs YRaOHXnkPNzJKXxbExRtilKa14Y4fvArwljjCbCmRqN44Je+hVYUjWKTz86S/G6crvqY hoV4rSeVQKpqrc7/UzG3wS+qYPiyKjlP7eNaJChRLV1CoPM4OFWDxeOerNZuzVHyjUy9 0ZSk+GKQKmkBziPEe4cTO6C+IUtgNjVEvH1Pffyhz2+7g0d6Ag0/cwwAQ+DnOE874vKK mP4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8B7Fq68wnL+yQIUQsG8r5BGlFegsTP6A5otg8Rqj0+c=; b=OWKaVRe4clTaNf2OrTGYP/rUm+V0sNTikV1RfByuvRhDbHgeTw0J6OaNoNuX3kPHVY 3r0T6hJjBcUAw75miURGK0uV5QUvvp1WIuxJSUreFjPvMuf2LMcH/taLTwgzWb7sP/fq /CrSWqH2bOT/DkB1rbpOr3uCtqnaho7I2Jwyp1ONmNGook31qEf3ZYi5xvFQ1Z9SF6K8 8vDKo2S0hntRVCybVt3+oQq0ibCIvaFEzUqqOxwD9NHPEcB55deKXgjW2AwQSM8BIcTu 06HQUgvMe7YX+/wBobl/ecqmjo124rzCGD+e90IBfLCLO9QxAzTcuiuf/rJlFXNJaa1+ LzVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnloH+ujhJves41EXsYRjb3m6l30LpgMHghbVbu0gyxK+sD1Bd9p3A5wYrY1uQQHPa286SY9cPrj9XJ8DTiCQYjqY1E/z7029tot3DEd9r56rcD2XZpQOLnD6wx2p+u1JDDuJQhusdjN10Sls2zHTrnf83V4bGkwiq0pyeVqVGXtl5I3xeBL0HZh6NzPZ+zVJdoPFgO
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.25.39 with SMTP id z7mr8089695igf.59.1378738066712; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 07:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.230.140 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 07:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL9PXLwXNVusi6n_QwDmLpFL+AtVE41LL0bCOU28BSKWnEMayA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AAE0766F5AF36B46BAB7E0EFB927320630E4A54175@GBTWK10E001.Technology.local> <522BE808.4090405@stpeter.im> <522C6892.4020206@drh-consultancy.co.uk> <522C7FD8.1000301@drh-consultancy.co.uk> <CABrd9SSbv1owOq9RK-OY2YqfUHavpebYCdKUVd6MGSff_MiiWg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPcvB2i2Xo7ceiybgLUw8KgJz=aJaNWEfTekFY1RdYC7w@mail.gmail.com> <CABrd9SSHzfFH03euDh1yP2AOxa7vQP2ds5EFyPrP-=BqJ7BOMA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9PXLwXNVusi6n_QwDmLpFL+AtVE41LL0bCOU28BSKWnEMayA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:47:46 +0100
Message-ID: <CABrd9SSLULXdrfrTNri9D9=n-fGDyp2m9i2+k-3=9z1wFDpoyg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd76898b48acd04e5f478c8"
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] padding bug
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 14:56:21 -0000

On 9 September 2013 15:42, Adam Langley <agl@google.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> wrote:
>


> Having an alternative to AES-GCM is certainly valuable, but I don't
> want it to be AES-CBC. I think the prior discussion around
> Salsa20/Chacha20 and a polynomial MAC is the most promising direction
> for that.
>

+1. Let's do that, too.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email