Re: [TLS] TLS Flags and IANA registration policy

Achim Kraus <achimkraus@gmx.net> Sun, 31 October 2021 08:28 UTC

Return-Path: <achimkraus@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618A23A07F0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 01:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.429
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.429 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VPJxPnEVSlL1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 01:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 844553A077C for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 01:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1635668924; bh=SVVnVBxB8+Shi7jGgSlAbznPyTNCMrYLXu/CxmhY4Og=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=c/Kwt+aUo55yDEWmYW8+lQGaRVxiGR1WjU5zH9eGLrb7F5ly8hvqBimjo3UPXZ96X kODBC52PptFwyGRxrhYlbcMrUYh3fkacp4b98QSky5YeSxZrocoVEhNbeHBAw+dZ/K DYiJr0heKoEo1j7KvzyQhgBLTQkr0NxZ7qjfrezI=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.10] ([5.146.193.130]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MAfYw-1mW8u42QaO-00B7qr for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:28:44 +0100
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
References: <DBBPR08MB59153B444624CEA8EC6E9A66FA819@DBBPR08MB5915.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <YXPSz6Uw9CDgl7tX@LK-Perkele-VII2.locald> <DBBPR08MB59157A0F39745E84309DDD8DFA839@DBBPR08MB5915.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <YXb02ETjp3dbFrXh@LK-Perkele-VII2.locald> <6DC9931F-7CEC-4DD3-87BC-EEA93A7B9646@akamai.com> <DBBPR08MB591549A109FC15BE09C22C73FA849@DBBPR08MB5915.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CAN40gSvYVSi6A7PVOiqmCxqwa2x3Y9ppowvXR9L46TJ1jmE=WQ@mail.gmail.com> <EADE1F53-1A25-4483-9D42-ADC71D935CBB@akamai.com> <CABcZeBMgW-rbooFPX6psv+jKeHLKuUEqtThA4inR3jiXTLt1qA@mail.gmail.com> <81AEBCC0-4704-4ED0-8A49-B3DC5842C005@akamai.com> <CABcZeBM39bQ3SwCD+NnewLnXd+wo-J+mMr5McsO2i4y922Eqbw@mail.gmail.com> <CAN40gSvu=1wWoYD3p9ygmDP0w13-yuH0SdeOR2mN8UScnuZw7w@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMY1Z_CmPNatJA5kca1d4jvfg7GquK3+b+fdfwBxS2suA@mail.gmail.com> <FC121E09-92D9-477D-B8F2-511D5179B46B@sn3rd.com>
From: Achim Kraus <achimkraus@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <0d2d454f-83b9-12b1-893c-16faf5ada45e@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:28:43 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <FC121E09-92D9-477D-B8F2-511D5179B46B@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: de-AT-frami
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:omztwdBkSPYo1XPHvQgkjNGT0etKbqW3iTviqpmGWjEBgv2Ytq8 wjkDzfN3moWcAnDX7/tgkG3YJ5fGAU83DdEN/Q5hLft+FsyIIE4Ui4YeGpcZBPlp+adYE7V KGL8kpKZFRgciSS8fKJz6CQqt7Ln2iAr5Z8kOvmXcAB2GcL5sFOf+s+dO+ZDCbR6P1BvcA0 MfePJMHrqumt8DT7R1GqA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:AADYjbjGOFY=:UNNrfS/Pkmw8X2/HfpHm7P QtH8f3FhhPUe3U24AY6tc/ENkoQHtrcZ1FnZ37FnPF8YMX6IZNEaexloVtdxMh4oKdFFTBEQZ EE9WkJayTxJqu5uc84PFY2dNxYLVFuF+SKUjC4KFib/j154KX4YNtYhKbFa6aZz4KFZPLnDvQ CYzf8Y/8sH1wzHOnBJpjbQ+qTrJMw6aqv6DBsjk4jX703TXF0QNwiBoArRQOjhGLY7wA84rhu L6StYWIke2GtX+O2mIpgp0TWkXHBJxO85+jLOKhFK/ntuyS6n49BSs1Q30BeSjNfqK16Flz6m DXbix8Cqy2s037UV//AT2Y14ERcWIjJzKBzxKa4VBDMfihlXlo+fwmfadFRVnaUeCX+bd/1EY kaSZrxKPR/YOphtv0QrpeEUPRKYm0veQmbGP43oZLUBAZZv3nLSIgDYgDF4NyIr85awlBlObt QYla/Q7r/PjQ9LIjBQdJ/uXyQIMOOsEoZ0V6jnGsLn7XgmWOrbKwow/p5uGtg04AQPLUEBRkn 3PXCcwTLWgLUDDdv4sCSAQKyrAkDszemlsjSeH011TQPWaaoSYf05o5kFavf+VEcEUIBAel2+ ISi6CpQBdcZZqCjUAA4hkhddLpq6vCxmoK0U4oBSZ9vt+/AzRmZRdJqi0NVzlBuNNSJKqreSf gAYxRb6fcAl9R1jBQAF7IeJH8njyXIENYWZ88G81AFkkOMVGOAqBEkbVPsGug+q/EHWhlz1Su YquHFdwniJDWkH4wzkzl6Qm/A7vKOCkUc6ATCVt2SnTSNx7ICmgOXDGuucOte2fKBxPwgBl1S EIrXFGJn5sS2ijROQjfdLSVR4IM9c5KwBBCpAVvmb/CsYUyODPnnCTv3lZj1RtkOfP9ZwMkYe +y3M8sdquTU8ZMq91jUAkqRd+hcqqMBOaElpZpDL/G6IS4N9zfQr3XoIVyUcr6ZxYA8NaWOTt TJdsexgmDkvPvKQZZ6Lzk6QKKbHh+qU+dtDi3dYE/VaqlW8RlA8YJTxV9ilJ9oflVYecB3tQu 3ufZb89MbhyUPMjxQ4Begl950L01JrX0nEfm7z4iNCRsKDvtun7up67F+JIf2JzYj/HCE6VTi OKRs4DfbWx5vg0=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/l-evv3lX7KGNmcYgIIJlUN3v9QE>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS Flags and IANA registration policy
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 08:28:54 -0000

Hi List,

a lot of things have already been written.

So I'm not sure, if my e-mail from September last year could be
considered as well.

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/pY6JDDb_WxBfgGbYh15vCS7sQQQ/

It's about, when replacing a "Y" with "N", then put also the period of
the "Y" amended to the "N", e.g. "N (was Y 2010-2019)".

best regards
Achim Kraus

Am 30.10.21 um 04:47 schrieb Sean Turner:
> I actually think we’re going to try to do this 8447bis:
> https://github.com/tls-stuff/rfc8447bis
> We need to get it adopted, but that’s on tap for this IETF (or should be).
>
> spt
>
>> On Oct 29, 2021, at 17:16, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Well, we certainly can change it in 8446-bis.
>>
>> My put here would be: let's get consensus on the *semantics* we want for the various categories without worrying about the names (call them A, B, C, etc.) and then we can name them after.
>>
>> -Ekr
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 2:14 PM Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> Thanks for the background.  I still sympathize with Hannes' point that
>> "Recommended" means "IETF Consensus".  I have to explain this
>> too often in the insular automotive industry.
>>
>> But I certainly wouldn't write an RFC to change the title of a single
>> column in an IANA registry.  I've been one of the Designated Experts
>> for the IANA Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) registry for 20 years and
>> we rename IANA fields as needed by a direct request to our IANA
>> folks (after consensus in the IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group IPP
>> WG - successor to IETF IPP WG in the 1990s).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - Ira
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 3:18 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>> Previous discussion is on this issue: https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1214
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:13 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
>> 	• I am actually not in favor of changing it to IETF Consensus. I think these have different meanings.
>>
>>
>> To be clear, I wasn’t expressing an opinion on whether or not to do this, I was just showing folks how to start the change process.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list
>> TLS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>