[TLS] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension-06: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 07 February 2018 13:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F66129C5D; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 05:21:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension@ietf.org, Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>, shuque@gmail.com, tls-chairs@ietf.org, joe@salowey.net, tls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.72.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151800968634.4877.12510609339415982154.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 05:21:26 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/lL6MbY9iYfB79rFtcS6Ybwt3p6U>
Subject: [TLS] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 13:21:26 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Two minor, mostly editorial comments:

1) Intro (sec 2): " It also provides the
   ability to avoid potential problems with TLS clients being unable to
   look up DANE records because of an interfering or broken middlebox on
   the path between the client and a DNS server."
Is that actually a well-known problem (can you provide a reference?) or would
it be enough to say something like this: " It also provides the
   ability to avoid potential problems with TLS clients being unable to
   look up DANE records when DNS server is not reachable."

2) IANA Considerations should probably be updated.