IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Closing PR#47 on draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates

Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com> Mon, 23 October 2017 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <bkaduk@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F92313A415 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02zxBvttp5gd for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F09B713A8A1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9NLfrIe015868; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 22:45:57 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=subject : to : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type; s=jan2016.eng; bh=AQRkIH8ZbaYYyC9fwYsjg0wE133ZicFuQCoNKRvRx3s=; b=cwdAFfcmC50A2fkhUwFFtwme0FaIDWF6xl2oxVgqJu0+dEFGXQzfzprjIZA2edR9uMm8 K/uOC+uTTplssFPXf/r/T/liD4Fsos/kgTfVQ4segHSTEmGAXrd6VU5uI8KMe4LeIV4P ervq4n122OyaK9NbRSZH5QqA41Sqc/kBh/H83f8Ob4t7uqdj3Zp81eTl9c7xuepAmRSb ciap3Kfb1DAiZrZbYd4H3x/P5F7AKrPT2suGbb/IhCzdlrojzMPM6egehHi66MDP3g/1 IJCOrHk26ohM1z9BtkBXJ4fDH3dtG6aKZTS8AWf97Ukd6bTJ/qMMMbDIb8z1e0yGNu5Q SA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2dqwgkr58m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 22:45:57 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9NLf5vU019901; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:45:56 -0400
Received: from prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com ([172.27.118.250]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2dr1ju6uhb-1; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:45:56 -0400
Received: from [172.19.17.86] (bos-lpczi.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.19.17.86]) by prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1ABF1FC7E; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 21:45:55 +0000 (GMT)
To: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
References: <CAOgPGoBpDpzpg0LyvZmnxq8qktRGT3_ArGtdCNNsC_KjwaiUMA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com>
Message-ID: <055efe53-193a-b626-5324-3cd834e70fd6@akamai.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:45:55 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOgPGoBpDpzpg0LyvZmnxq8qktRGT3_ArGtdCNNsC_KjwaiUMA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------5F35013D3B404C13A690C671"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-23_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710230305
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-23_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710230305
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/lVFspJcTy5DF_yvL3JG8wYjykx0>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Closing PR#47 on draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 21:46:09 -0000

On 10/23/2017 12:50 PM, Joseph Salowey wrote:
> ekr proposed a PR (#47) for  draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates that
> clarified the specification required rules to include Internet Drafts.  
>
> I believe this is not the intent and we should close the issue.  
>
> I think the intent of specification required is to allow a community
> that needs a code point to make a specification available in a public
> location that is relevant to that community. I don't think an an I-D
> would be appropriate in most cases.
>

I'm inclined to agree, given that something with an explicit expiration
data cannot be considered "stable".

(There's also a bit of a circular dependency in that the allocation
would have to point to a preexisting I-D version that could not then be
updated to refer to the allocated value, though I don't expect that to
actually give anyone much pause.)

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email