Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack

Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com> Wed, 09 September 2020 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <beldmit@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810913A0D99 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 08:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9udjJWLF5f0u for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 08:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06BB93A0DA8 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 08:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id gr14so4154426ejb.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 08:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EVoUeVxG/ZTeYPeYKD5KzTDpePyTOQ1bEnMOuE7MU9Y=; b=eLe8Ps2REAjxgMvT0SbjWPaze06W8BJU/Q+cGiQURDT8zPgIGDM8gip+gpreX/6I76 pA49jC5QTxkAJQk5tK/FDQvFlfExoouPlogHLuo/Zq9YOqPyKJdAt/sKU+T6xiiWt3JB vISH0U+5Njjjd+rzJnLKBrFRA4ic0gd7A4hBoJgExACY61dxAB7sqdlA9IaVH9LvjOYs N0VMnVMw2qu1iKf00U0jpwCM6YUN60coQ8QHCvRfjam6edcbrZJcPfdQc6zWGKveIxyO QHNP3ejHU1qpEAkNUKIIYktCfKaxv7JA7uX9xNplg0D1rLfJJwOIirGJfh4w311Kfnjy aLqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EVoUeVxG/ZTeYPeYKD5KzTDpePyTOQ1bEnMOuE7MU9Y=; b=Lw15a7WBZaNDA2MMqaULYOriwr+gjzWh8TQKeIFESXA653CqpQPdPZ6BVkfvwJPVik xyiXbK4jM63KDmNvD8UGdPeDuGG+FfBmJOU7MjAzNVeePxEGKOIZgNl+nYzAWhkhs7P1 71LspKpYvac8rHIcsLGACiW5PPpfbAmd09EE7A/j7HfI+/7XbMsMCGuAtZwzozO10mEy h5BaCtg2k0L/fNDleBRzLigwk58lhtfR8MCZpNuz0gnsK7uQsN1qCnn6v7uwFk7VAEtI vysIohABgPy0IKj8Xdip8898sKSt7fzXTem44NemzQDPP/sSKxkkonjlVNEqxt2uvrsC f/oA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531V+v+I7TGbHlQ9yHCLdaARPOQFnmIdnJmQUvSq8nHT6bYyFjvc imNpY8oFjIdiHI8A//3ayjF6PR6uWqKXblTOlfXHxem2hwU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwaDXdyNWQrQPHMWe8CDg7l+7Hperp9MubLsPqIloAYMtlj5AgUuw35d0/luyUOLahdX9y8RAxQvR51q0qbbGY=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fb8f:: with SMTP id lr15mr4053081ejb.25.1599664657386; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 08:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5595BB40-3AFD-4327-B7B7-5E63FFC594DD@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <5595BB40-3AFD-4327-B7B7-5E63FFC594DD@akamai.com>
From: Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:18:59 +0300
Message-ID: <CADqLbzKc3UnkqLhMdUWhqh8pbdQGuwHV1E27zKGfq2mGLpb9ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: TLS Mailing List <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a9ede605aee2f318"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ldkxPANA2Pf50zYbBgSLTHKBzs8>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:17:49 -0000

I also want to remind about so called "Enterprise TLS" — if I remember
correctly, they introduced this bug to their modified TLS 1.3
specification...

ср, 9 сент. 2020 г., 18:04 Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>:

> https://raccoon-attack.com/
>
>
>
> Do we need a short RFC saying “do not use static DH” ?
>
>
>
> I am probably not the only one thinking fondly of
> draft-green-tls-static-dh-in-tls13 now.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>