Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types will never work.
"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 03 March 2016 19:04 UTC
Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8D51B40B2 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:04:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.706
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.706 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJ7gvCb7Qn3K for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:04:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com [23.79.238.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD4C1B410F for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:03:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA6D4334A1; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 19:03:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com [172.27.118.251]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867354334A0; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 19:03:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1457031830; bh=MZt3c022xwdrrc5yAUv6PfUeXPeBIsT4R583SX8ZXno=; l=5134; h=From:To:CC:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oBF9VCGuGo4V++Ml2QzGoYD22MrpxA9v9/6/9wB9w70/gTElnX/RCN1JjcNZlsYqi ZGrvBtOXRz80FD1jfKGM1/+iZDIr2K03KbWe1999dhJxFkTZySOUf0HENgDADkSZUD n82EVq3HLrZh2/wg/98C9ITkJs6j9lrw30PXEoKc=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas1.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8366B1FC8A; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 19:03:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 14:03:49 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 14:03:49 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types will never work.
Thread-Index: AQHRdX1zuTC0M4YSiEineZj3dIEZkJ9IZaOA//+tv9A=
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:03:49 +0000
Message-ID: <fe2f1f0050f74e34ae231839ab425ddf@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CAMfhd9WNHqfRH=M=_B7_apJ-r43fi8qoe-+VcDkrKPwwhkPR5A@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNeeyzGa_vfovJRdoHEcTY_s4xhASCHDMt5vE6fKiZq_g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNeeyzGa_vfovJRdoHEcTY_s4xhASCHDMt5vE6fKiZq_g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.112.149]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_fe2f1f0050f74e34ae231839ab425ddfusma1exdag1mb1msgcorpak_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/leEQcY2fAis4m8pDXPY_y0Zgqvk>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types will never work.
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:04:27 -0000
I’m in favor, wearing both OpenSSL and Akamai hats. And wouldn’t it be a much kinder world if Adam wrote all posts on this list? ☺ -- Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies IM: richsalz@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
- [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types will ne… Adam Langley
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Adam Langley
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Richard Moore
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Yuhong Bao
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Richard Moore
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Richard Moore
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types wil… Adam Langley