Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01
Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com> Mon, 24 October 2016 17:13 UTC
Return-Path: <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411301297BD for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zKzcC_Ss_8i1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam02on0121.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.36.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0DCD12944B for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=XXBWYqPJKZo+gBKc4wvF0is/H0zKK8yPj9veNJ//J3Y=; b=EtO9inmMyAW2UQEazaHpZJ4Zhl+/4H5yTFdoCYVxxWkktpWGMkUAR9V3HHxq2c0neigIUu9EptKW+SnpGoTMUhrB9m3TDLDax/GS+s8mWUkDpKWdfqpbC63tZ5MbObe05lWmb9k10MsrVQevB+6pt3SKIOeu4ez2Gb4+PaYoGwg=
Received: from CY1PR0301MB0842.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.163.148) by CY1PR0301MB0841.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.163.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.649.16; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:13:35 +0000
Received: from CY1PR0301MB0842.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.163.148]) by CY1PR0301MB0842.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.163.148]) with mapi id 15.01.0649.027; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:13:35 +0000
From: Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>
To: Xiaoyin Liu <xiaoyin.l@outlook.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01
Thread-Index: AQHSLHDaWBwLpJvS+kKEBgtLVtl0yKC0mEsAgAAaz4CAAyezAA==
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:13:35 +0000
Message-ID: <CY1PR0301MB0842CC0E796B33854E68C9B98CA90@CY1PR0301MB0842.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <26941608-3cb4-2625-cd07-f2a1953fc394@cs.tcd.ie>, <CABcZeBPqr=TKfx-OaPuhVOkWgSJbRX7-sZtrL1X5b7q3p8QYqw@mail.gmail.com> <CY1PR15MB0778458060E6DE7CDC085127FFD70@CY1PR15MB0778.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR15MB0778458060E6DE7CDC085127FFD70@CY1PR15MB0778.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8::1d2]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f09e9dc6-0a15-4eca-4577-08d3fc3116a7
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0301MB0841; 7:PinKcfFy19FCIUdIkTSEjvLtPFWsHI/nSMF8SzqHM/m4nIKGNvgykCVrmvUVTYctkElEeH5yJ5ryLEIJs8VyJkHU72UeNa181hXeCbUD7KdAl1wRAR1gFPLp1d437gZjYrlAJhLGPDnOLmaUkipomB8YoflRAXWxuVuDPON8ZKJSBMFwal57xeEU7SS8Ai4ALYAPHq38xo+/P+oNEgQnDLQF5pQarI8dXLa10DnrbTSR3iqhIovew0Op9PDes7dKtWNCmFtsuE7S7iVbrN53/icszck/mkeL+uZBgLznKiDXhwFY7MNE1gdg/6y9PAMFIZdEtRbm0PbADmfHd1SfT5IcoJ7VCjDEG0fgnE5gyszFCPW6qxgBJ6mhYfJBIpB1
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0841;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY1PR0301MB08417B50963234EE9B3B93FB8CA90@CY1PR0301MB0841.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(32856632585715)(100405760836317)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0841; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(304825118); SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0841;
x-forefront-prvs: 0105DAA385
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(7916002)(189002)(377454003)(53754006)(24454002)(199003)(10090500001)(106116001)(7846002)(102836003)(5005710100001)(77096005)(19580395003)(50986999)(15975445007)(3280700002)(33656002)(7736002)(2900100001)(9686002)(7110500001)(19580405001)(230783001)(586003)(76176999)(74316002)(68736007)(105586002)(2906002)(10710500007)(106356001)(54356999)(7906003)(87936001)(97736004)(5001770100001)(6116002)(19300405004)(4326007)(81166006)(8936002)(189998001)(19617315012)(81156014)(7696004)(790700001)(5002640100001)(92566002)(16236675004)(86362001)(3660700001)(10290500002)(86612001)(76576001)(3900700001)(2950100002)(11100500001)(10400500002)(19625215002)(5660300001)(15650500001)(8990500004)(2420400007)(101416001)(8676002)(122556002)(99286002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0841; H:CY1PR0301MB0842.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CY1PR0301MB0842CC0E796B33854E68C9B98CA90CY1PR0301MB0842_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Oct 2016 17:13:35.0842 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0301MB0841
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/m0PEsNU-Fbmwv5zJu0mqAqBU0ow>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:13:40 -0000
+1 Definitely good enough starting point. Cheers, Andrei From: TLS [mailto:tls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xiaoyin Liu Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 10:02 AM To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>; Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Cc: tls@ietf.org Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01 +1 Xiaoyin From: Eric Rescorla<mailto:ekr@rtfm.com> Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 11:26 AM To: Stephen Farrell<mailto:stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Cc: tls@ietf.org<mailto:tls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01 +1 This draft just codifies stuff that we had already agreed on but had been awkwardly stuffed in TLS 1.3. Having it separate is an improvement. -Ekr On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie<mailto:stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>> wrote: Hi all, Sean and Joe wrote up this IANA registry draft as per discussions at WG meetings and on the list. As they've done the initial work, but are WG chairs, they wanted me (as responsible AD) to call consensus for it. (They wrote this up as finding authors for such fairly boring stuff was hard - thank them for taking one for us all when you see 'em:-) Based on the earlier discussions and limited mails on this draft, I do think there's consensus to adopt this approach and that the text in the I-D [1] is a good enough starting point for the WG. If you think otherwise, please comment to the list in the next week. If you've questions about all this from a process-crap POV, feel free to ask those on or off the list as you think appropriate;-) Note that if this is adopted as a WG item, the chairs might decide to continue as editors or recruit someone else. In the former case, I'm fine with doing the WGLC stuff when this is ready (which it nearly is IMO, so there may or may not be a need for new authors, depends on what the WG think of the text I'd guess). Cheers, S. [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01 _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org<mailto:TLS@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
- [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registr… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-reg… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-reg… Xiaoyin Liu
- Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-reg… Sean Turner
- Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-reg… Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-reg… Andrei Popov
- Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-reg… Stephen Farrell