[TLS] TLS 1.3

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 15 February 2018 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7359124D68 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 11:46:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kKsKxcV9XL_X for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 11:46:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22c.google.com (mail-pg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7354B120227 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 11:46:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id f6so578139pgs.10 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 11:46:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VBfu2Vyg0hStjlUHwsRHKoVwjESPicG62GdRWsZLagA=; b=kA7GYRfhLZ257rC3SPJw9xeTQ3H1uUtPzJ1ByT0oroXJgSrqOZ4JtsXKjPWuhpsdWT pnuthVEy3ZOijIsF0Oqr73/YHWoTzhO0htiJO12NEbr9Tb47Fg3U16uc7N9Vjkvioigr O8FV+OwmCCN37uWKuwLl/b00mOVm0ieN4c1+PgIKza3dP6N625JeQ6CK/QFV5RUzfJpF QjtZeO0KL2E26TMXCe5jdVhOJ7nhYc3/rndbH9AImtP6s6GJTFAXf1pGLqWt4u7b3UgL Dd0na/9wklKPbauyWv8ZX2Wsu+9JUSHwXskz1gVSj7OB2svt/ua9QNQVkZ/OeyboH+S1 cTQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VBfu2Vyg0hStjlUHwsRHKoVwjESPicG62GdRWsZLagA=; b=QP8r5n4l96WCj8FxOpItj27WgwHjLgxtZY9LD1eggRuy1lQ68pOB4kfKfNGxKjMDRy RRQC8u/D5NJCzqwKfUq2V59b8t+q5AYmXnGzk265QJVNK+szmylTK3FNnMq4WBlW/nOT DqOEX3yhu7i0J3BaJDJo/V0f9ifCBj+292/rss9ECG+gDptjqv5Ajcx/cR82c6+nYhX9 GohjnchIMuES2+EaK+XQxpZh9DumBeMRo9JNx3FbKiDHxRtM6abd+kQabhXFi/y7pSQM DeKOnXbOSQBez9Vycevt9qK46gikxVVSeRlDtO9kfVDRXnfwNab/dWylAgcSqVwMZq+m MMdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCkHCGOqYHUu3sFYpyOASAzRWKo+MUcBArVys1bjDkBZt15WevJ OPjBfrCVXkDNMa2APo1A9EGNMjRJoEHJ/YPLNpU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2251eAOkuA9jmAYBdrJiucWmzIMB/V51uQUistY0OoHkHGqMbPU5ScchhifV3ZZeXzVhK1VgG3ksH5cVRH82Qyg=
X-Received: by 10.99.123.74 with SMTP id k10mr3076163pgn.217.1518723976865; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 11:46:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.186.143 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 11:45:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:45:36 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH4hUP_h0yxk-6YN=i0gWnCTK7KcibTzP+c=wgvn3PNPrQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/mHI0o1-QFfjJL162odd4RojCNX0>
Subject: [TLS] TLS 1.3
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:46:19 -0000

Hello,

Thanks for all the hard work on TLS 1.3.  The chairs have handed off
the document for IETF last call and I'll start that shortly.  There
are some idnits that were just caught and are queued up for the next
version - an unnecessary reference is removed.

There are also a 6 RFCs obsoleted that are not referenced in the
abstract and that should be addressed prior to IESG review.

The improved discussion on 0-RTT is much appreciated.

-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen