IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] SNI and Resumption/0-RTT

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 21 October 2016 12:42 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF44212959D for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 05:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D26-I5Yv4_SF for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 05:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x234.google.com (mail-qt0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58516129420 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 05:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x234.google.com with SMTP id s49so83977746qta.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 05:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mmvkG5Xd39ivjIgHweYbCptIrccBlRoJTzCA+VT/hRQ=; b=bDrQ45LY+MEv+YpJMVk71sDKj6nUSN6G1jlN0xetsM8or4MgMN2DInX5YrA86tOAeC f+HqTfo+C51c0Mhca3uwG0jh55/7NlHBnWb/XBpmRDkAQRWFcvu5idIUxpsx9b+VCcWL vF7xGZWTWdXWFUHupSObWFFRGEG5pZA+eosVp9drJUdxStGIYdUsq0tXpzegwWIlk3u5 FrqLke4aP/vN1UtJvHUuKO5MZTf2BegN3zHoeYLfw2i4ol0McUnRWBi8ypqG4oumVoNT JdTjoDq9kH+44HRhbsbr5g6rI4fp7edY9xmFs+LVpG3bWhlseQCIj8Q5Hgd0ZhDKfvrg fjrQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mmvkG5Xd39ivjIgHweYbCptIrccBlRoJTzCA+VT/hRQ=; b=Hcm4XCUue9dES23JGFSSbYlVh5PpLusntsmKDx79egWcWAbZ+dDv+OrBFguFwWJa54 kr/sG1nZSFxzNujnWPR2P9F/QP8QyAxKuLCkp+tP6ZQHzzQrrP/CPxJP9WZQ8VF/j0ha H4uTgUNnI7KejJr/tjQeeW27gQlBLZbrCeWgK3yvnFff4srFUtzaJGk3NLv6kUAvR8I8 UgHNEZo8q1Pz/OqEx2ulUanvIoL7BaEiCJCur11cQ3DTaxxBP9JeP3m2QfQt3TKm6DyC mbdWdaJrLtt1+27VCqZqIw0sbsj1CL0Tl8V8UQAbiGnEZJjh6RdT8NZ3WqB2PPqIvO43 C7SQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveWzmiKxgl4HOni61l2Ck8N6O4fQlPs1SwtQQ833cup7jDkyexFxJXSpZy9rm6lYQTa3emdP5i+BZB59w==
X-Received: by 10.200.45.170 with SMTP id p39mr832004qta.32.1477053720501; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 05:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.85.7 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 05:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20161021085502.GA7878@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
References: <CABcZeBNroww_zA0BRsMrZPMCrF42b2OZPsQNZ9w0bjPoF+fSHw@mail.gmail.com> <20161021085502.GA7878@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 23:41:59 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVTtDsjJGuv0wG0JQGQcQE-omW=syK=zToKZ-sRumDqEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/mUmhChbdeYYbOrVzs7aorwtdajY>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] SNI and Resumption/0-RTT
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:42:04 -0000

On 21 October 2016 at 19:55, Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com> wrote:
> Of course, defining the "same certificate" is
> way trickier than it initially seems

Not if you think simplistically: same octets in EE ASN1Cert in both handshakes.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email