Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 04 June 2020 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE953A0A93 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 09:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mUmP47odPm4i for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 09:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF5093A0A90 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 09:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE97300B67 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 12:24:42 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id BYZWvOravLNW for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 12:24:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (pool-72-66-113-56.washdc.fios.verizon.net [72.66.113.56]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEDD8300A3B; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 12:24:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <070E5A6D-7D2F-405A-B5D8-8C90379306D9@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_547FA8C8-2CC0-4864-A66B-9CE5F7EA2795"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 12:24:41 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBOmRAFV9M1W6bmD8OCFcDpQmC+5M=4reRzMhjnpPHC4dg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
References: <20200604000011.387A5F4070F@rfc-editor.org> <73b5d3e2-d2f4-447c-84d6-0ae0a08374a9@www.fastmail.com> <CABcZeBMswqW4rWGmTxwK_zUy0-anRt6PFPo_YK1zNhWQw7wtSg@mail.gmail.com> <F3357894-3045-44A9-B30E-8AD2DEB37DE6@vigilsec.com> <CABcZeBOmRAFV9M1W6bmD8OCFcDpQmC+5M=4reRzMhjnpPHC4dg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/m_FCFmP9g3P6SwIJBmjCwM02wr0>
Subject: Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:24:47 -0000

Eric:

>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:07 PM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net <mailto:mt@lowentropy.net>> wrote:
>> I think that this is a useful erratum and it should be approved/HFDU.  The extension to which this text alludes is RFC 8773, not post_handshake_auth.
>> 
>> Yes, although 8773 actually is not super-clear about post-handshake, so that's actually something we should clarify there.
> 
> RFC 8773 is not intended for post handshake.  So, I never thought about that.  What is the use case you are considering?
> 
> I don't have one. I'm just trying to make sure things are clear. perhaps an erratum on 8773 to make ultra clear?

I do not find it unclear.  What do you have in mind?

Russ