IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] TLS-PWD vs. TLS-SRP

"Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org> Wed, 06 November 2013 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1061A21F9EB5 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:32:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oo-seWPGQFPv for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:32:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from colo.trepanning.net (colo.trepanning.net [69.55.226.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D946C21E808F for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:32:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.trepanning.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colo.trepanning.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A00B10224008; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:32:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 31.133.163.31 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dharkins@lounge.org) by www.trepanning.net with HTTP; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:32:11 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <de8e217085c2cc62290e9dad107c84ed.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAEKgtqm5pKf+Ky2jazGpDan02yjdtAOhiwfCyAiT_uEHHhEnuA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEKgtqmAvR3FoWqE8HxxTWSGrmzEGVKGih4k0+iGXDtodDaMFw@mail.gmail.com> <2fde1fc4aa651cb7bcb38749fb24fa25.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <CAEKgtqm5pKf+Ky2jazGpDan02yjdtAOhiwfCyAiT_uEHHhEnuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:32:11 -0800
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
To: SeongHan Shin <seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.14 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS-PWD vs. TLS-SRP
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 22:32:30 -0000

  Hi Shin,

On Wed, November 6, 2013 1:24 pm, SeongHan Shin wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Here comes the next question:
> Is there any advantages of tls-pwd over tls-augpake and SPEKE?
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shin-tls-augpake-01
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPEKE_%28cryptography%29

  Mrs. Harkins didn't raise a moron. I really do not want to
repeat the debacle that occurred on the IPsec mailing list
regarding PAKE schemes.

  If you would like to rehash all those exchanges I suggest
you go look at the archives.

  regards,

  Dan.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email