IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Re: Confirming PQ+T Signatures Consensus

Damien Miller <djm@mindrot.org> Fri, 02 October 2026 01:28 UTC

Received: from train.compute.dc.uq.edu.au (train.compute.dc.uq.edu.au [130.102.189.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1801542 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Oct 2026 01:28:16 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mx.ietf.org; dkim=none; spf=pass (mx.ietf.org: domain of djm@mindrot.org designates 130.102.189.35 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=djm@mindrot.org; dmarc=none
Received: from smtp2.compute.dc.uq.edu.au (smtp2.compute.dc.uq.edu.au [10.208.138.89]) by train.compute.dc.uq.edu.au (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 6921S8sK011796; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 11:28:08 +1000
Received: from mailhub.eait.uq.edu.au (holly.eait.uq.edu.au [130.102.79.58]) by smtp2.compute.dc.uq.edu.au (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 6921S8vf034419 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 2 Oct 2026 11:28:08 +1000
Received: from haru.mindrot.org (haru.mindrot.org [130.102.96.5]) by mailhub.eait.uq.edu.au (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id 6921S8fa001300 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Oct 2026 11:28:08 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by haru.mindrot.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e4ad03f2; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 11:28:07 +1000 (AEST)
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 11:28:07 +1000
From: Damien Miller <djm@mindrot.org>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <A383CF85-CF66-4A3D-AFBC-3F2CCFEE265C@sn3rd.com>
Message-ID: <f7690c3f-ed4e-e106-9714-4241a9ae6169@mindrot.org>
References: <A383CF85-CF66-4A3D-AFBC-3F2CCFEE265C@sn3rd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
x-ms-reactions: disallow
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 on 130.102.79.58
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Message-ID-Hash: QEQ5NKHITJEDE3LYSGZPU2XUA62RKEWP
X-Message-ID-Hash: QEQ5NKHITJEDE3LYSGZPU2XUA62RKEWP
X-MailFrom: djm@mindrot.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; header-match-tls.ietf.org-1; header-match-tls.ietf.org-2; header-match-tls.ietf.org-3; header-match-tls.ietf.org-4; header-match-tls.ietf.org-5; header-match-tls.ietf.org-6; header-match-tls.ietf.org-7; header-match-tls.ietf.org-8; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: Confirming PQ+T Signatures Consensus
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/mbLKRoyEiJTM3fay9UlLsMdhhxk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

On Mon, 28 Sep 2026, Sean Turner wrote:

> Please provide your answers to the following questions by 12 October 2026:
> 
> 1. Should the WG work on PQ + T Hybrid Signatures for TLS?
> 2. Should the WG only work on one: -pqt-dual-certs or -composite-ml-dsa?
> 3. Should the WG work on: -pqt-dual-certs?
> 4. Should the WG work on: -composite-ml-dsa?

(1) yes
(2) only one
(3) no
(4) yes

Thanks,
Damien

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status