IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] TLS Impact on Network Security draft updated

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 24 July 2019 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4634F1201D0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 06:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pGFD2Nzq_4BY for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 06:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C48441200EC for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 06:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x6OD6iZx015387; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:11:32 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=pMAazZAV3eCaR+cUVWvJt5EJyquh018s2uU6pxZB6bY=; b=M0crzpI9nufwc3Gb0gwnOc/NDyrk5FJcgWPPaVHjzQ1eecSwLM0nUfxcK0SSCYnFC9Sc wL1Rxo58genfdYLK0eNSncxGDHe5cu5gqgVJo3/5XgnpoZ8V4jcWE9/e0vWe9Z9fL6XA W/xKs3eaUeb8c3aqTe/W6380YCSApV9YR7fmlc91e89ROIQFI5+djLdCCaEG1hTqNydd 1J3tZhbrbQfuhFOXGjGq+k/ThO56tjwk+tkq98eWcMi2URvkbWtF3UGOq2a64WLZwHj4 LkA0nVa9xOGO5xburxgmNMERVYim12NZNgEA0tnZgQ8DuFdxqo9MxJeNWIvg8kxTnYmE dA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2tx60rukq2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:11:32 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x6OD25Dw024136; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:11:31 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2tx62ycesa-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:11:29 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:11:29 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:11:29 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Ackermann, Michael" <MAckermann@bcbsm.com>, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>, Filippo Valsorda <filippo@ml.filippo.io>
CC: TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] TLS Impact on Network Security draft updated
Thread-Index: AQHVP8tnovYBmAyQbUu5TybMCHUv66bZFHaAgAADLgCAAEiDgIAAYt0A
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:11:28 +0000
Message-ID: <F47FF706-325D-4D1D-8788-EED294D121B3@akamai.com>
References: <6AF48228-19C2-41C7-BA86-BA16940C3CFF@cisco.com> <77d58a41-7a6b-4886-a4d4-22dcb229100b@www.fastmail.com> <CACsn0cmxuUTxAGxdmmtyg7BX0GPJLht343CRcFrakLvsbKM2zQ@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR14MB24745D7DDD5F1503387A7694D7C60@DM6PR14MB2474.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR14MB24745D7DDD5F1503387A7694D7C60@DM6PR14MB2474.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1b.0.190715
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.35.184]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F47FF706325D4D1D8788EED294D121B3akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-07-24_05:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1907240147
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:5.22.84,1.0.8 definitions=2019-07-24_05:2019-07-24,2019-07-24 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=987 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1011 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1906280000 definitions=main-1907240148
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/mgypNBz9yY5q01nesKfTGwkTQu0>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS Impact on Network Security draft updated
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:11:36 -0000

  *   This should not be dismissed as small segments of industries.    This represents ubiquitous use cases at all large organizations in Insurance, Health Care, Banking, Automotive and many others.

All generalization are false, including the claim that these are ubiquitous uses at all large organizations in the named industries.  I know counterfactuals.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email