Re: [TLS] n00b question regarding TLS-OBC

Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Fri, 25 October 2013 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <agl@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F52011E81C0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 07:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gV79p6Iv2a0i for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 07:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ve0-x22f.google.com (mail-ve0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAA311E81B0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 07:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f175.google.com with SMTP id jz11so2626208veb.6 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 07:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=P6X9nmNXGMToyyKieGrVoAq+jdERBr9RQgC2fuDwqNw=; b=GGRJJeWhX8iem1gzl3W3SKJ4cHdd3eR6k78PnQGLaVAsP4sDaq1VfN9mUUdIAXcWQA Ygi0DayTqhfGb9SSG7KyZKDVibmzyCM4P/w9C4DrI6RuLETz6KBg65FS4fkMhxx1Jm+F qKalyF9xSSFC1x3iNfqCMuBd6jtMKoMMJB7dkZpG8CIFfGYb7jymFqa5k5+kayvbfbdy hx+BV7j2pVQEVU4EZpYDzueKDBhkNa6g4UTFin7DY4NDVVYt116ogcpI0iaFAGKCyaQW GcORaOfxbSybg5NfpYhvvTu4vJYSUT3+f2OIRUv+slqws9mAhLXqyx0YJcXOu5xVmhCr WhPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=P6X9nmNXGMToyyKieGrVoAq+jdERBr9RQgC2fuDwqNw=; b=UMxyp+pSwBRtM8Nu1mIA8NlEYbKzP/r6PEPmiiMbzr8UqxXyYYmIF06Kffd9qrDAXp AOMNxQp03Txnw0Y/XIg9H0U9KKd9VjTfuFTyjRCQdYrXpWs0nMTGZv80CqXzhQmPkO+Q U0j4TscE6U8vS3+D89+85n6e0ua00d/Yq9k1wX8okerbs04MWDc57vr7WjUjg2HfGxd1 VQWoiumA0fp7lmfo7HlnFSwhAInjEwoaWGP/DY49PIIvORghn1bffI0hEX7Q0Xo0kWaQ UqD4SizCuqul/maOjKd3nB3F68YIpdhKNLkdxusVBQNe51k6yfAtxDDK6gwZvH/4Rl56 UttA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkLEmIqQrHddjAYwu/t2/+lzH+EiUY5jLn1KvzLsyFJLYq0oPD4KsVtx4JwrS6VHJiKIhXncYcMV1AkZLx9TrgXSFYp+z1tPMvD0gNXSu/rf4qxoeag4p4aMeHm0684rykDPt7u/TsI9SgCoekvVX8ga0nhu7ED1QTzzGKj0v4nQttKfgS8NkFZYrDqY5tltlwI1Jw2
X-Received: by 10.220.1.203 with SMTP id 11mr4870274vcg.15.1382712031826; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 07:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.100.40 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 07:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <526A8166.7090702@telia.com>
References: <526A8166.7090702@telia.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:40:10 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL9PXLwrNxNARz0=1cCEDQf2LsFvbQUvH=yLNs=UBqg+vBYS6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] n00b question regarding TLS-OBC
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:40:50 -0000

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Anders Rundgren
<anders.rundgren@telia.com>; wrote:
> If I understand it correctly TLS-OBC uses TLS CCA (Client Certificate Authentication) .

OBC did, but that got replaced for the reasons given in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-balfanz-tls-channelid-00#section-2


Cheers

AGL