RE: [TLS] extension number conflict
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 09 February 2007 00:43 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFJrn-0008R6-1N; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 19:43:55 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFJrm-0008QO-25 for tls@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 19:43:54 -0500
Received: from balder-227.proper.com ([192.245.12.227]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFJrk-0005YT-Iw for tls@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 19:43:54 -0500
Received: from [10.20.30.108] (dsl-63-249-108-169.cruzio.com [63.249.108.169]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l190hdrI087672 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 17:43:41 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p062408ddc1f173ede5ce@[10.20.30.108]>
In-Reply-To: <A15AC0FBACD3464E95961F7C0BCD1FF01DA29082@EA-EXMSG-C307.europe.corp.micros oft.com>
References: <200702082259.XAA10273@uw1048.wdf.sap.corp> <45CBB5B5.9020305@pobox.com> <A15AC0FBACD3464E95961F7C0BCD1FF01DA29082@EA-EXMSG-C307.europe.corp.micros oft.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:43:29 -0800
To: Stefan Santesson <stefans@microsoft.com>, Mike <mike-list@pobox.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: RE: [TLS] extension number conflict
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc:
X-BeenThere: tls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tls-bounces@lists.ietf.org
At 12:01 AM +0000 2/9/07, Stefan Santesson wrote: >What about assigning an experimental/local range that can be used >until the real number is assigned. >That should avoid conflicts effectively. If you want to make a change to how the numbers are assigned, you should write an Internet Draft to change the procedure and bring it to the TLS WG. "What about this" and "how about that" are fairly meaningless when there is already rules that people agreed to on how to do this. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
- [TLS] extension number conflict Mike
- Re: [TLS] extension number conflict Russ Housley
- Re: [TLS] extension number conflict Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] extension number conflict Mike
- RE: [TLS] extension number conflict Stefan Santesson
- RE: [TLS] extension number conflict Paul Hoffman
- RE: [TLS] extension number conflict Pasi.Eronen
- Re: [TLS] extension number conflict Mike
- Re: [TLS] extension number conflict tom.petch
- RE: [TLS] extension number conflict Stefan Santesson