Re: [TLS] chacha/poly interop?
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com> Mon, 14 December 2015 12:49 UTC
Return-Path: <nmav@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE2E1ACE09 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:49:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dAfD5Kx24k_s for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:49:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8E2F1A6F8C for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:49:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7399EC0B930A; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:49:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dhcp-10-40-3-124.brq.redhat.com (dhcp-10-40-3-124.brq.redhat.com [10.40.3.124]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tBECnm0U030730 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Dec 2015 07:49:49 -0500
Message-ID: <1450097387.3786.53.camel@redhat.com>
From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:49:47 +0100
In-Reply-To: <ffd74054d64047cd9dfebc6e9fd6bc19@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <ffd74054d64047cd9dfebc6e9fd6bc19@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-Tqiz1KvvoyfJh3lyRZdw"
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/mkVwBgXCeF7uBB2qrxT-RlyPz7o>
Subject: Re: [TLS] chacha/poly interop?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:49:52 -0000
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 01:02 +0000, Salz, Rich wrote: > OpenSSL just landed our chacha/poly implementation into master. We > pass the RFC test vectors, looking for other implementations to test > against. Thanks. It seems to interoperate with gnutls' implementation. regards, Nikos
- [TLS] chacha/poly interop? Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] chacha/poly interop? David Benjamin
- Re: [TLS] chacha/poly interop? Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] chacha/poly interop? Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] chacha/poly interop? Jeffrey Walton
- Re: [TLS] chacha/poly interop? David Benjamin
- Re: [TLS] chacha/poly interop? Jeffrey Walton
- Re: [TLS] chacha/poly interop? Joachim Strömbergson