Re: [TLS] Obstacles to standardizing ECC in TLS

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 10 June 2014 01:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EFC1A0342 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K5RG-UP2j8f5 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com [72.246.2.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220E71A0338 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055214742F; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:55:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com [172.17.121.112]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E379C4740D; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:55:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from usma1ex-cashub.kendall.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cashub5.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.27.105.21]) by prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6DB80040; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:55:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.107.26]) by USMA1EX-CASHUB5.kendall.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.105.21]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 21:55:24 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 21:55:23 -0400
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Obstacles to standardizing ECC in TLS
Thread-Index: Ac+EK2g2PW9AIL64TKGU1PaP6f5SPAAI4KVw
Message-ID: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7130F43545E@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CACsn0ckhfGrcvAfuF+z5vjQ-tert0NPNSg6oAQyJk87mGpvv8A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0ckhfGrcvAfuF+z5vjQ-tert0NPNSg6oAQyJk87mGpvv8A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/nQVigClaBfTujpu1iaUDj1OrPZU
Subject: Re: [TLS] Obstacles to standardizing ECC in TLS
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:55:31 -0000

> The second is that the CFRG has not yet decided which curves to use.

My recollection is that CFRG has picked 25519 as its (first perhaps) recommend curve.  Sean Turner, which my assist, owes an I-D based on the original paper.

	/r$

--  
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technologies, Cambridge, MA
IM: rsalz@jabber.me; Twitter: RichSalz