Re: [TLS] WGLC for "Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1"

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 03 May 2019 19:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A1B120052 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2019 12:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ozhqSatWILHs for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2019 12:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02EEF12016B for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 May 2019 12:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id o16so5214250lfl.7 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 May 2019 12:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ElbXEfR+QUVEOQMxVbwgUMWClbIFbhleTKeEfd8pTkk=; b=xA9TS1Qm9qJ/HHDzAxrBVbxnJo118chYtnMmr04WVhcYJIUWL8Bd9SM3vzqFj2rK7J ZnVPuQt8rCEveVUopBWF/QBNg8i64VrwhKsmAqkEsuaUmaiLn2wMtPWRh+oaUC7iXxXQ UwJOsqiCvbldyIH775AXq8NKKULbkzGDbQDIeTNiZJ5duCPm4memOmHDLLAfkr3Tf0X9 T18CYqCT31xPDiFAdR1JHt0acZMU8O8eWj1dZxCrHRMrjFDleph1zXZUcGDwt7yVjEZs 5rsiW+mWfU4sZAPwiM2jGhGtEefRH2B0xHSVs5VQG3PZlBBy+aUqREfI2L/hVT7I1v4C IiFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ElbXEfR+QUVEOQMxVbwgUMWClbIFbhleTKeEfd8pTkk=; b=JN5kx5lXj+EB1iZ0BBCbP8+Mv2rGWI0nYJo4Ww2NREAXom40uzBsG8Fjun9BGEbUnV qZ/gld1LZi1j03K0o9bVO/1y7iB+kA256ethl+iKSEyd5DvNJEIhYju6nZ0eJ89C7OmW 4DzBq9AApujd7lB1XKRX5e418MhEAAe3car68OQIj3YvSNGA6q7n1tEZtGM7yYNr/TOe TgciK4Ktm3Jc5FPNKutZrfr8Gt3SAN8ycVg6ZnIw/NoyXK457tSgll4QdLYIpG61STVL tbKnMT1xKKnpsSAQ9VgpHOX977vePDe/zw0oTQlxdtZTcYcQqH+e4YGC1y/H/b5HjI8O S1Mg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUFy7mtRLRnn0/E35gch/w+3S+1j1TIQKf4+q0WPrlb2cm3Gu0R ZryiEMb+BDZMKqYCooH0MEX3W5ehXU4EODCrBaWhyQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwd+hmzM5fmJ4XO5A621st7wFoIa5KB+wQXkUX/J2VEEU9ifOmmoRNkfFZMrIvi/TUV+R3mLRGNpKYz1l5xfcg=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4109:: with SMTP id b9mr5869207lfi.90.1556913449122; Fri, 03 May 2019 12:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <28511b10-8f6a-4394-95a9-5188130f7b58@www.fastmail.com> <7d37f7ca-e253-4c95-9cf7-2d16b0b6a0aa@www.fastmail.com> <20190430234952.21F5C404C@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <5441930.X76MtM1CnQ@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <1556902416424.28526@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <20190503172022.GH4464@akamai.com> <1556904629782.23087@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
In-Reply-To: <1556904629782.23087@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 12:56:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNKgSFYg7gm-4ZibHSzDxO9qSjM5UGQXo81Rv7_r+m9gw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000014d336058801296d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/nRS3P_ywmdMzHnOCjuVGgW4ocbA>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for "Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1"
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 19:57:34 -0000

On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 10:31 AM Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
wrote:

> Having said that, given an RFC saying MUST NOT 1.0 and 1.1 which is what
> the
> original discussion was about, why not also add MUST NOT MD5 and SHA1 in
> TLS
> 1.2 to the text?
>

This seems like a reasonable proposal.

-Ekr


> Peter.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>